LU
Price
$2.80
Change
-$0.02 (-0.71%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.09B
62 days until earnings call
QD
Price
$2.87
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
562.25M
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LU vs QD

Header iconLU vs QD Comparison
Open Charts LU vs QDBanner chart's image
Lufax Holding
Price$2.80
Change-$0.02 (-0.71%)
Volume$29.37K
Capitalization5.09B
Qudian
Price$2.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.56K
Capitalization562.25M
LU vs QD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LU vs. QD commentary
Jun 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LU is a Buy and QD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2025
Stock price -- (LU: $2.82 vs. QD: $2.87)
Brand notoriety: LU: Not notable vs. QD: Notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LU: 78% vs. QD: 82%
Market capitalization -- LU: $5.09B vs. QD: $562.25M
LU [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.09B. QD’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $562.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LU and QD are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QD is a better buy in the short-term than LU.

Price Growth

LU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -2.76% price change this week, while QD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

QD is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.50% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($5.09B) has a higher market cap than QD($562M). QD (19.77) and LU (19.53) have similar P/E ratio . LU YTD gains are higher at: 17.992 vs. QD (1.773). QD has less debt than LU: QD (9.37M) vs LU (43.1B). LU has higher revenues than QD: LU (32B) vs QD (398M).
LUQDLU / QD
Capitalization5.09B562M906%
EBITDAN/A-339.48M-
Gain YTD17.9921.7731,015%
P/E Ratio19.5319.7799%
Revenue32B398M8,040%
Total CashN/A8.79B-
Total Debt43.1B9.37M460,028%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QD: Fundamental Ratings
QD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUQD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESEAX33.140.29
+0.88%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq A
HDCTX9.89N/A
N/A
Rational Equity Armor Fund Instl
TSNIX51.53N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Science & Tech I
FPKFX16.23N/A
N/A
Fidelity Puritan K6
WBAIX16.84N/A
N/A
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Instl Cl

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
+1.08%
QFIN - LU
51%
Loosely correlated
+6.07%
FINV - LU
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
YRD - LU
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
LX - LU
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.05%
QD - LU
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
More