LUCD
Price
$1.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
105.97M
52 days until earnings call
VMTHF
Price
$0.52
Change
+$0.27 (+108.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
190M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUCD vs VMTHF

Header iconLUCD vs VMTHF Comparison
Open Charts LUCD vs VMTHFBanner chart's image
Lucid Diagnostics
Price$1.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$813.53K
Capitalization105.97M
VENUS MEDTECH HANGZHOU
Price$0.52
Change+$0.27 (+108.00%)
Volume$124
Capitalization190M
LUCD vs VMTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VMTHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUCD vs. VMTHF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUCD is a Buy and VMTHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LUCD: $1.04 vs. VMTHF: $0.52)
Brand notoriety: LUCD and VMTHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUCD: 69% vs. VMTHF: 4%
Market capitalization -- LUCD: $105.97M vs. VMTHF: $190M
LUCD [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $105.97M. VMTHF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $190M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $232.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUCD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVMTHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LUCD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VMTHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VMTHF is a better buy in the long-term than LUCD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUCD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VMTHF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUCD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • VMTHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VMTHF is a better buy in the short-term than LUCD.

Price Growth

LUCD (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -2.80% price change this week, while VMTHF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUCD is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.15% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMTHF($190M) has a higher market cap than LUCD($106M). VMTHF YTD gains are higher at: 4711.111 vs. LUCD (27.031).
LUCDVMTHFLUCD / VMTHF
Capitalization106M190M56%
EBITDA-54.36MN/A-
Gain YTD27.0314711.1111%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.36MN/A-
Total Cash31.1MN/A-
Total Debt27.6MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUCDVMTHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VMTHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEFDF0.53N/A
N/A
DELFI LTD
CYDX0.23N/A
N/A
CYduct Diagnostics Inc.
KTERF36.10N/A
N/A
Keio Corp.
FRGGF0.32N/A
N/A
Forge Resources Corp.
KGSPY82.15-0.09
-0.11%
Kingspan Group plc.

LUCD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCD and NOTV have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCD and NOTV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUCD
1D Price
Change %
LUCD100%
N/A
NOTV - LUCD
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.23%
FEMY - LUCD
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
CRL - LUCD
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
INGN - LUCD
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
PAVM - LUCD
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
More

VMTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VMTHF and AVCRF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VMTHF and AVCRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMTHF
1D Price
Change %
VMTHF100%
N/A
AVCRF - VMTHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+30.06%
LUCD - VMTHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BJDX - VMTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
MDXH - VMTHF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
BCCOY - VMTHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More