LUCMF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.01 (-2.63%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
SCCFF
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.61 (-56.48%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Ad is loading...

LUCMF vs SCCFF

Header iconLUCMF vs SCCFF Comparison
Open Charts LUCMF vs SCCFFBanner chart's image
LUCA MINING
Price$0.37
Change-$0.01 (-2.63%)
Volume$540.06K
CapitalizationN/A
Strategic Resources
Price$0.47
Change-$0.61 (-56.48%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
LUCMF vs SCCFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUCMF vs. SCCFF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUCMF is a StrongBuy and SCCFF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LUCMF: $0.37 vs. SCCFF: $0.47)
Brand notoriety: LUCMF and SCCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUCMF: 157% vs. SCCFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LUCMF: $49.71M vs. SCCFF: $18.14M
LUCMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $49.71M. SCCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $18.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCCFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LUCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUCMF is a better buy in the long-term than SCCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUCMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCCFF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUCMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCCFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCCFF is a better buy in the short-term than LUCMF.

Price Growth

LUCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.88% price change this week, while SCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUCMF($49.7M) has a higher market cap than SCCFF($18.1M). LUCMF YTD gains are higher at: 64.931 vs. SCCFF (-56.759).
LUCMFSCCFFLUCMF / SCCFF
Capitalization49.7M18.1M275%
EBITDA-4.28MN/A-
Gain YTD64.931-56.759-114%
P/E Ratio1.17N/A-
Revenue65.1MN/A-
Total Cash3.62MN/A-
Total Debt43.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUCMF vs SCCFF: Fundamental Ratings
LUCMF
SCCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1240
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4675
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCCFF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUCMF (62). This means that SCCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

SCCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCMF (100). This means that SCCFF’s stock grew similarly to LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCFF (95). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew similarly to SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SCCFF (75). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew similarly to SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCCFF (100). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUCMFSCCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMSI51.50N/A
N/A
Invesco Municipal Strategic Income ETF
IBD23.58-0.02
-0.08%
Inspire Corporate Bond ETF
EPRF18.68-0.06
-0.34%
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Prfrd ETF
VTI299.66-1.49
-0.49%
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
NVDY22.70-0.30
-1.30%
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF

LUCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCMF and AAGFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCMF and AAGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUCMF
1D Price
Change %
LUCMF100%
+1.60%
AAGFF - LUCMF
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
AOTVF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
LUNMF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
TGB - LUCMF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARREF - LUCMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
More

SCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCCFF has been loosely correlated with NLIBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCCFF jumps, then NLIBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCCFF
1D Price
Change %
SCCFF100%
N/A
NLIBF - SCCFF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ILKAF - SCCFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUIFF - SCCFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUCMF - SCCFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
SHERF - SCCFF
0%
Poorly correlated
-7.12%
More