LUCRF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
MDSMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

LUCRF vs MDSMF

Header iconLUCRF vs MDSMF Comparison
Open Charts LUCRF vs MDSMFBanner chart's image
Lucara Diamond
Price$0.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
TEN SIXTY FOUR
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$75.63K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LUCRF vs MDSMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
LUCRF vs. MDSMF commentary
Nov 04, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUCRF is a Hold and MDSMF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 04, 2024
Stock price -- (LUCRF: $0.37 vs. MDSMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: LUCRF and MDSMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUCRF: 2% vs. MDSMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LUCRF: $138.89M vs. MDSMF: $57.33M
LUCRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $138.89M. MDSMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $57.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUCRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDSMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LUCRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MDSMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LUCRF and MDSMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

LUCRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MDSMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUCRF($139M) has a higher market cap than MDSMF($57.3M). MDSMF has higher P/E ratio than LUCRF: MDSMF (20.92) vs LUCRF (5.58). MDSMF YTD gains are higher at: 49900.000 vs. LUCRF (27.564). LUCRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 66.5M vs. MDSMF (31.9M). MDSMF has more cash in the bank: 51.1M vs. LUCRF (31.2M). MDSMF has less debt than LUCRF: MDSMF (3.2M) vs LUCRF (112M). LUCRF has higher revenues than MDSMF: LUCRF (187M) vs MDSMF (147M).
LUCRFMDSMFLUCRF / MDSMF
Capitalization139M57.3M243%
EBITDA66.5M31.9M208%
Gain YTD27.56449900.0000%
P/E Ratio5.5820.9227%
Revenue187M147M127%
Total Cash31.2M51.1M61%
Total Debt112M3.2M3,504%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUCRF vs MDSMF: Fundamental Ratings
LUCRF
MDSMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9365
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3771
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6569
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDSMF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LUCRF (96). This means that MDSMF’s stock grew significantly faster than LUCRF’s over the last 12 months.

MDSMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCRF (100). This means that MDSMF’s stock grew similarly to LUCRF’s over the last 12 months.

MDSMF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCRF (93). This means that MDSMF’s stock grew similarly to LUCRF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCRF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDSMF (71). This means that LUCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDSMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCRF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as MDSMF (69). This means that LUCRF’s stock grew similarly to MDSMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CARG31.150.13
+0.42%
CarGurus
AMBO1.60N/A
N/A
Ambow Education Holding Ltd
CRDL1.80N/A
N/A
Cardiol Therapeutics
Z59.80-0.29
-0.48%
Zillow Group
IGIC21.72-0.55
-2.47%
International General Insurance Holdings Ltd

LUCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCRF and MRZLF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCRF and MRZLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUCRF
1D Price
Change %
LUCRF100%
+1.09%
MRZLF - LUCRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFRSF - LUCRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.31%
CALRF - LUCRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBYMF - LUCRF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAGE - LUCRF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MDSMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MDSMF and ZIJMY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDSMF and ZIJMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDSMF
1D Price
Change %
MDSMF100%
N/A
ZIJMY - MDSMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALKEF - MDSMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNCCF - MDSMF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LONCF - MDSMF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
MAGE - MDSMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More