LUGDF
Price
$57.41
Change
-$0.55 (-0.95%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.95B
82 days until earnings call
NSUPF
Price
$0.83
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
142.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUGDF vs NSUPF

Header iconLUGDF vs NSUPF Comparison
Open Charts LUGDF vs NSUPFBanner chart's image
Lundin Gold
Price$57.41
Change-$0.55 (-0.95%)
Volume$29.92K
Capitalization13.95B
Northern Superior Resources
Price$0.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$120.7K
Capitalization142.73M
LUGDF vs NSUPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUGDF vs. NSUPF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUGDF is a Buy and NSUPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (LUGDF: $57.41 vs. NSUPF: $0.83)
Brand notoriety: LUGDF and NSUPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUGDF: 30% vs. NSUPF: 47%
Market capitalization -- LUGDF: $13.95B vs. NSUPF: $142.73M
LUGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.95B. NSUPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $142.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $79.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUGDF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNSUPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • NSUPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than NSUPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSUPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NSUPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the short-term than NSUPF.

Price Growth

LUGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while NSUPF (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5323.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.84% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUGDF($13.9B) has a higher market cap than NSUPF($143M). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 177.255 vs. NSUPF (141.363). LUGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. NSUPF (-15.04M). LUGDF has more cash in the bank: 452M vs. NSUPF (8.4M). LUGDF has higher revenues than NSUPF: LUGDF (1.32B) vs NSUPF (0).
LUGDFNSUPFLUGDF / NSUPF
Capitalization13.9B143M9,720%
EBITDA1.15B-15.04M-7,652%
Gain YTD177.255141.363125%
P/E Ratio22.60N/A-
Revenue1.32B0-
Total Cash452M8.4M5,380%
Total Debt298MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF vs NSUPF: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
NSUPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2075
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
265
SMR RATING
1..100
20100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSUPF (96). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSUPF (65). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSUPF (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as NSUPF (35). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSUPF (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUGDFNSUPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSUPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIGIX31.060.09
+0.29%
William Blair International Growth I
FGRCX27.96N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock C
HHULY9.51N/A
N/A
Hamburger Hafen Und Logistik Ag
NNUP1.50N/A
N/A
Nocopi Technologies, Inc.
PRSEF4.95N/A
N/A
Prosafe SE (Cyprus)

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
-0.95%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
TORXF - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
More