LUGDF
Price
$65.99
Change
+$1.07 (+1.65%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
16.41B
61 days until earnings call
PUMXF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
14.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUGDF vs PUMXF

Header iconLUGDF vs PUMXF Comparison
Open Charts LUGDF vs PUMXFBanner chart's image
Lundin Gold
Price$65.99
Change+$1.07 (+1.65%)
Volume$73.96K
Capitalization16.41B
Puma Exploration
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.2K
Capitalization14.97M
LUGDF vs PUMXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUGDF vs. PUMXF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUGDF is a Buy and PUMXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LUGDF: $67.70 vs. PUMXF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: LUGDF and PUMXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUGDF: 82% vs. PUMXF: 11%
Market capitalization -- LUGDF: $16.41B vs. PUMXF: $14.97M
LUGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $16.41B. PUMXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $14.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUGDF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whilePUMXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • PUMXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than PUMXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUGDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUMXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PUMXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the short-term than PUMXF.

Price Growth

LUGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.92% price change this week, while PUMXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4920.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUGDF($16.4B) has a higher market cap than PUMXF($15M). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 226.949 vs. PUMXF (74.563). LUGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.03B vs. PUMXF (-1.33M). LUGDF has more cash in the bank: 493M vs. PUMXF (89.3K). LUGDF has higher revenues than PUMXF: LUGDF (1.47B) vs PUMXF (0).
LUGDFPUMXFLUGDF / PUMXF
Capitalization16.4B15M109,333%
EBITDA1.03B-1.33M-77,508%
Gain YTD226.94974.563304%
P/E Ratio26.65N/A-
Revenue1.47B0-
Total Cash493M89.3K552,072%
Total Debt298MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF vs PUMXF: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
PUMXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2630
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
295
SMR RATING
1..100
1994
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMXF (35). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to PUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUMXF (95). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUMXF (94). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMXF (36). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to PUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUMXF (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUGDFPUMXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHAU19.180.82
+4.47%
Direxion Dly CSI 300 CHN A Shr Bl 2X ETF
JHEM30.260.29
+0.98%
JHancock Multifactor Em Mkts ETF
AVDE77.260.42
+0.55%
Avantis International Equity ETF
FOWF30.050.13
+0.43%
Pacer Solactive Whitney Fut of Wrfr ETF
ROSC45.67-0.04
-0.08%
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF

PUMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUMXF and DCHRF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUMXF and DCHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUMXF
1D Price
Change %
PUMXF100%
+1.74%
DCHRF - PUMXF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUGDF - PUMXF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
LGCFF - PUMXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
SNGCF - PUMXF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
DC - PUMXF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-5.02%