It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LULU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LULU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LULU (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while MTC (@Packaged Software) price change was +14.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.52%.
LULU is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
MTC is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2025.
Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
@Packaged Software (+3.77% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
LULU | MTC | LULU / MTC | |
Capitalization | 48.5B | 366M | 13,251% |
EBITDA | 2.59B | -6.96M | -37,166% |
Gain YTD | -38.542 | -34.726 | 111% |
P/E Ratio | 31.57 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 9.62B | 879K | 1,094,312% |
Total Cash | 2.24B | 7.02M | 31,952% |
Total Debt | 1.4B | 1.09M | 128,598% |
LULU | MTC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTC's Valuation (31) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LULU (75) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that MTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LULU’s over the last 12 months.
MTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LULU (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that MTC’s stock grew similarly to LULU’s over the last 12 months.
LULU's SMR Rating (22) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as MTC (27) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LULU’s stock grew similarly to MTC’s over the last 12 months.
MTC's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LULU (65) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that MTC’s stock grew similarly to LULU’s over the last 12 months.
LULU's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as MTC (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LULU’s stock grew similarly to MTC’s over the last 12 months.
LULU | MTC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago61% | 4 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 5 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago69% | 18 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago61% | 4 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LULU has been loosely correlated with ZUMZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LULU jumps, then ZUMZ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LULU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LULU | 100% | +1.49% | ||
ZUMZ - LULU | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
GCO - LULU | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
BKE - LULU | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
LE - LULU | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
AEO - LULU | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTC has been loosely correlated with TMOAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTC jumps, then TMOAF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MTC | 100% | -3.32% | ||
TMOAF - MTC | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
BILI - MTC | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
UBER - MTC | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
API - MTC | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
YMM - MTC | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More |