It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LUMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LUMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OOMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LUMN (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -10.95% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +9.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.93%.
LUMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
LUMN | OOMA | LUMN / OOMA | |
Capitalization | 1.58B | 219M | 719% |
EBITDA | -6.09B | 6.28M | -97,100% |
Gain YTD | 366.667 | 24.790 | 1,479% |
P/E Ratio | 2.50 | 121.43 | 2% |
Revenue | 14.6B | 228M | 6,404% |
Total Cash | 2.23B | 29.5M | 7,573% |
Total Debt | 20.3B | 16.4M | 123,780% |
LUMN | OOMA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 40 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LUMN's Valuation (42) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OOMA (76). This means that LUMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
OOMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LUMN (100). This means that OOMA’s stock grew similarly to LUMN’s over the last 12 months.
OOMA's SMR Rating (88) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LUMN (97). This means that OOMA’s stock grew similarly to LUMN’s over the last 12 months.
LUMN's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as OOMA (37). This means that LUMN’s stock grew similarly to OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
OOMA's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LUMN (96). This means that OOMA’s stock grew similarly to LUMN’s over the last 12 months.
LUMN | OOMA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago69% | 7 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUMN has been loosely correlated with ATGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LUMN jumps, then ATGN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LUMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LUMN | 100% | -1.04% | ||
ATGN - LUMN | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
FYBR - LUMN | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
CCOI - LUMN | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
OOMA - LUMN | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
LILA - LUMN | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that OOMA and S have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OOMA and S's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OOMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OOMA | 100% | +0.15% | ||
S - OOMA | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.57% | ||
ATEX - OOMA | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.26% | ||
SHEN - OOMA | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
LILA - OOMA | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
ATUS - OOMA | 30% Poorly correlated | -5.36% | ||
More |