LUNG
Price
$1.76
Change
-$0.10 (-5.38%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
71.71M
61 days until earnings call
XVIPF
Price
$20.54
Change
-$2.46 (-10.70%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
574.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUNG vs XVIPF

Header iconLUNG vs XVIPF Comparison
Open Charts LUNG vs XVIPFBanner chart's image
Pulmonx
Price$1.76
Change-$0.10 (-5.38%)
Volume$880.01K
Capitalization71.71M
Xvivo Perfusion AB
Price$20.54
Change-$2.46 (-10.70%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization574.65M
LUNG vs XVIPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XVIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUNG vs. XVIPF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUNG is a StrongBuy and XVIPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LUNG: $1.76 vs. XVIPF: $20.54)
Brand notoriety: LUNG and XVIPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUNG: 124% vs. XVIPF: 152%
Market capitalization -- LUNG: $71.71M vs. XVIPF: $574.65M
LUNG [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $71.71M. XVIPF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $574.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $228.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUNG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXVIPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUNG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XVIPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUNG is a better buy in the long-term than XVIPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUNG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XVIPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • XVIPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XVIPF is a better buy in the short-term than LUNG.

Price Growth

LUNG (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +15.03% price change this week, while XVIPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUNG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.89% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XVIPF($575M) has a higher market cap than LUNG($71.7M). XVIPF YTD gains are higher at: -50.034 vs. LUNG (-74.080). XVIPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 182M vs. LUNG (-51.84M). XVIPF has more cash in the bank: 323M vs. LUNG (84.2M). LUNG has less debt than XVIPF: LUNG (56.8M) vs XVIPF (111M). XVIPF has higher revenues than LUNG: XVIPF (823M) vs LUNG (90.5M).
LUNGXVIPFLUNG / XVIPF
Capitalization71.7M575M12%
EBITDA-51.84M182M-28%
Gain YTD-74.080-50.034148%
P/E RatioN/A55.96-
Revenue90.5M823M11%
Total Cash84.2M323M26%
Total Debt56.8M111M51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XVIPF: Fundamental Ratings
XVIPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUNGXVIPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XVIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JFEIX40.02N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic L
DQICX33.66N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund C
AVUAX16.84N/A
N/A
American Century Mid Cap Value I
NWHOX29.70N/A
N/A
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci A
AFGZX32.21N/A
N/A
Alger Global Equity Z

LUNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUNG has been loosely correlated with SRTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LUNG jumps, then SRTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUNG
1D Price
Change %
LUNG100%
-5.38%
SRTS - LUNG
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.77%
BAX - LUNG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
ALGN - LUNG
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
VAPO - LUNG
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KIDS - LUNG
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
More

XVIPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XVIPF and USAQ have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XVIPF and USAQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XVIPF
1D Price
Change %
XVIPF100%
N/A
USAQ - XVIPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VYCO - XVIPF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
ZTEK - XVIPF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
LUNG - XVIPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.38%
VPTDF - XVIPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
More