LUXPQ
Price
$0.01
Change
+$0.01 (+Infinity%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SOND
Price
$1.87
Change
-$0.06 (-3.11%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUXPQ vs SOND

Header iconLUXPQ vs SOND Comparison
Open Charts LUXPQ vs SONDBanner chart's image
LuxUrban Hotels
Price$0.01
Change+$0.01 (+Infinity%)
Volume$502
CapitalizationN/A
Sonder Holdings
Price$1.87
Change-$0.06 (-3.11%)
Volume$800
Capitalization22.49M
LUXPQ vs SOND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUXPQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUXPQ vs. SOND commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUXPQ is a Hold and SOND is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (LUXPQ: $0.01 vs. SOND: $1.93)
Brand notoriety: LUXPQ and SOND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUXPQ: 26% vs. SOND: 311%
Market capitalization -- LUXPQ: $0 vs. SOND: $22.49M
LUXPQ [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $0. SOND’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $22.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $72.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $8.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUXPQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUXPQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SOND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUXPQ is a better buy in the long-term than SOND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUXPQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOND’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUXPQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SOND’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SOND is a better buy in the short-term than LUXPQ.

Price Growth

LUXPQ (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOND (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was +19.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (+0.60% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOND YTD gains are higher at: -39.308 vs. LUXPQ (-99.928).
LUXPQSONDLUXPQ / SOND
CapitalizationN/A22.5M-
EBITDAN/A-34.79M-
Gain YTD-99.928-39.308254%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A574M-
Total CashN/A247M-
Total DebtN/A1.78B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUXPQSOND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUXPQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KC16.920.86
+5.35%
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited
RCMT26.810.02
+0.09%
RCM Technologies
EJH1.09-0.01
-0.86%
E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited
LOMA7.46-0.20
-2.61%
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
FERG224.48-7.06
-3.05%
Ferguson Enterprises Inc.

LUXPQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUXPQ and GHG have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUXPQ and GHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUXPQ
1D Price
Change %
LUXPQ100%
N/A
GHG - LUXPQ
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
SHCO - LUXPQ
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOKA - LUXPQ
4%
Poorly correlated
+11.11%
SOND - LUXPQ
1%
Poorly correlated
+14.20%
ATAT - LUXPQ
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%

SOND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOND and WH have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOND and WH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOND
1D Price
Change %
SOND100%
+14.20%
WH - SOND
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
CHH - SOND
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
ATAT - SOND
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
HLT - SOND
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
H - SOND
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
More