LVGLF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
22.59M
PLGDF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.04 (-3.85%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
66.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVGLF vs PLGDF

Header iconLVGLF vs PLGDF Comparison
Open Charts LVGLF vs PLGDFBanner chart's image
LAKE VICTORIA GOLD
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$82.73K
Capitalization22.59M
PALISADES GOLD
Price$1.00
Change-$0.04 (-3.85%)
Volume$6.36K
Capitalization66.51M
LVGLF vs PLGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVGLF vs. PLGDF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVGLF is a StrongBuy and PLGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LVGLF: $0.15 vs. PLGDF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: LVGLF and PLGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVGLF: 119% vs. PLGDF: 31%
Market capitalization -- LVGLF: $22.59M vs. PLGDF: $66.51M
LVGLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.59M. PLGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $66.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVGLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LVGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LVGLF is a better buy in the long-term than PLGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVGLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLGDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LVGLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PLGDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LVGLF is a better buy in the short-term than PLGDF.

Price Growth

LVGLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +11.80% price change this week, while PLGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4218.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.84% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLGDF($66.5M) has a higher market cap than LVGLF($22.6M). LVGLF YTD gains are higher at: 44.083 vs. PLGDF (8.096). LVGLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.86M vs. PLGDF (-141.69M). PLGDF has more cash in the bank: 23.2M vs. LVGLF (114K). LVGLF (0) and PLGDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LVGLFPLGDFLVGLF / PLGDF
Capitalization22.6M66.5M34%
EBITDA-1.86M-141.69M1%
Gain YTD44.0838.096544%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash114K23.2M0%
Total Debt1.02MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVGLF: Fundamental Ratings
LVGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVGLFPLGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBKM20.830.13
+0.63%
Consumers Bancorp, Inc.
JUMSF27.50N/A
N/A
Jumbo SA
AIABF0.19N/A
N/A
CAPITAL A BERHAD
ARLUF46.50N/A
N/A
Aristocrat Leisure Ltd.
NRCD0.05N/A
N/A
Nashville Records, Inc.

LVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LVGLF and PLGDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVGLF and PLGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVGLF
1D Price
Change %
LVGLF100%
+2.65%
PLGDF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
CGLCF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
GRCAF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.28%
WGXRF - LVGLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
FDMIF - LVGLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More