Advertisement
LVMHF vs PNDZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVMHF is a Hold and PNDZF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LVMHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNDZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LVMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PNDZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LVMHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNDZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LVMHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- PNDZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
LVMHF (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while PNDZF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.59%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-0.09% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| LVMHF | PNDZF | LVMHF / PNDZF | |
| Capitalization | 467B | 8.45B | 5,526% |
| EBITDA | 29.8B | 8.75B | 340% |
| Gain YTD | -18.729 | -4.775 | 392% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.97 | 12.36 | 210% |
| Revenue | 84.7B | 26.6B | 318% |
| Total Cash | 10.4B | 541M | 1,922% |
| Total Debt | 38.2B | 10.8B | 354% |
LVMHF | PNDZF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 21 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LVMHF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PNDZF (48). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew similarly to PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.
PNDZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVMHF (84). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.
PNDZF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LVMHF (99). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew significantly faster than LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.
PNDZF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVMHF (82). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.
LVMHF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as PNDZF (70). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew similarly to PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.
| LVMHF | PNDZF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 60% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QQMG | 38.90 | 0.49 | +1.27% |
| Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | |||
| FINS | 13.15 | 0.09 | +0.69% |
| Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust | |||
| RGEF | 28.18 | 0.17 | +0.59% |
| Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | |||
| GOF | 14.97 | 0.03 | +0.20% |
| Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | |||
| VWID | 32.05 | N/A | N/A |
| Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | |||
LVMHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVMHF has been closely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVMHF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVMHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVMHF | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| LVMUY - LVMHF | 98% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| HESAY - LVMHF | 81% Closely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| CFRUY - LVMHF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| HESAF - LVMHF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| PPRUY - LVMHF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||
PNDZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PNDZF and DCOHF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNDZF and DCOHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNDZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNDZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DCOHF - PNDZF | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LKFLF - PNDZF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
| LVMHF - PNDZF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
| PPRUF - PNDZF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| LVMUY - PNDZF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||