LVMHF
Price
$601.50
Change
+$17.38 (+2.98%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
290.27B
PNDZF
Price
$138.50
Change
-$30.60 (-18.10%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVMHF vs PNDZF

Header iconLVMHF vs PNDZF Comparison
Open Charts LVMHF vs PNDZFBanner chart's image
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
Price$601.50
Change+$17.38 (+2.98%)
Volume$1.89K
Capitalization290.27B
Pandora A/S
Price$138.50
Change-$30.60 (-18.10%)
Volume$311
Capitalization10.7B
LVMHF vs PNDZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVMHF vs. PNDZF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVMHF is a Buy and PNDZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LVMHF: $601.50 vs. PNDZF: $138.50)
Brand notoriety: LVMHF and PNDZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVMHF: 34% vs. PNDZF: 135%
Market capitalization -- LVMHF: $290.27B vs. PNDZF: $10.7B
LVMHF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $290.27B. PNDZF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $10.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $290.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $38.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVMHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNDZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LVMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PNDZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNDZF is a better buy in the long-term than LVMHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVMHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNDZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LVMHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PNDZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LVMHF is a better buy in the short-term than PNDZF.

Price Growth

LVMHF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +6.69% price change this week, while PNDZF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -18.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+2.52% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVMHF($290B) has a higher market cap than PNDZF($10.7B). LVMHF has higher P/E ratio than PNDZF: LVMHF (23.49) vs PNDZF (13.14). LVMHF YTD gains are higher at: -8.406 vs. PNDZF (-22.007). LVMHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.5B vs. PNDZF (10.3B). LVMHF has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. PNDZF (817M). PNDZF has less debt than LVMHF: PNDZF (16.1B) vs LVMHF (39.6B). LVMHF has higher revenues than PNDZF: LVMHF (82.8B) vs PNDZF (32.5B).
LVMHFPNDZFLVMHF / PNDZF
Capitalization290B10.7B2,710%
EBITDA25.5B10.3B248%
Gain YTD-8.406-22.00738%
P/E Ratio23.4913.14179%
Revenue82.8B32.5B255%
Total Cash12.3B817M1,506%
Total Debt39.6B16.1B246%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVMHF vs PNDZF: Fundamental Ratings
LVMHF
PNDZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2896
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7453
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6184
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNDZF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (81). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (74). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (100). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

LVMHF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as PNDZF (84). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew similarly to PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

LVMHF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PNDZF (100). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew similarly to PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVMHFPNDZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOMP58.720.27
+0.47%
SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Comps ETF
AFLG37.790.05
+0.12%
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
SIXO33.730.03
+0.09%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Apr/Oct ETF
EZPZ30.27-0.16
-0.53%
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
PSCU56.65-0.50
-0.87%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Ult & Comnc Svc ETF

LVMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVMHF has been closely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVMHF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVMHF
1D Price
Change %
LVMHF100%
+2.97%
LVMUY - LVMHF
98%
Closely correlated
+2.96%
HESAY - LVMHF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
CFRUY - LVMHF
77%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
HESAF - LVMHF
72%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
PPRUY - LVMHF
68%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
More

PNDZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNDZF and DCOHF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNDZF and DCOHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNDZF
1D Price
Change %
PNDZF100%
N/A
DCOHF - PNDZF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKFLF - PNDZF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVMHF - PNDZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
PPRUF - PNDZF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVMUY - PNDZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
More