LVRLF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
18.62M
MCUJF
Price
$0.91
Change
+$0.01 (+1.11%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVRLF vs MCUJF

Header iconLVRLF vs MCUJF Comparison
Open Charts LVRLF vs MCUJFBanner chart's image
CordovaCann
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.62K
Capitalization18.62M
Medicure
Price$0.91
Change+$0.01 (+1.11%)
Volume$636
Capitalization11.29M
LVRLF vs MCUJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LVRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCUJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVRLF vs. MCUJF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVRLF is a Hold and MCUJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LVRLF: $0.04 vs. MCUJF: $0.91)
Brand notoriety: LVRLF and MCUJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVRLF: 50% vs. MCUJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LVRLF: $18.62M vs. MCUJF: $11.29M
LVRLF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $18.62M. MCUJF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $11.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVRLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCUJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LVRLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCUJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCUJF is a better buy in the long-term than LVRLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVRLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCUJF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LVRLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCUJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCUJF is a better buy in the short-term than LVRLF.

Price Growth

LVRLF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -6.00% price change this week, while MCUJF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +93.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

LVRLF is expected to report earnings on May 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+2.13% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVRLF($18.6M) has a higher market cap than MCUJF($11.3M). MCUJF YTD gains are higher at: 47.000 vs. LVRLF (-6.000). MCUJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.24M vs. LVRLF (-2.57M). MCUJF has more cash in the bank: 4.93M vs. LVRLF (746K). MCUJF has less debt than LVRLF: MCUJF (777K) vs LVRLF (5.81M). MCUJF has higher revenues than LVRLF: MCUJF (23M) vs LVRLF (4.45M).
LVRLFMCUJFLVRLF / MCUJF
Capitalization18.6M11.3M165%
EBITDA-2.57M3.24M-79%
Gain YTD-6.00047.000-13%
P/E RatioN/A12.53-
Revenue4.45M23M19%
Total Cash746K4.93M15%
Total Debt5.81M777K748%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVRLF vs MCUJF: Fundamental Ratings
LVRLF
MCUJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
10093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCUJF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVRLF (98). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVRLF (94). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

MCUJF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LVRLF (100). This means that MCUJF’s stock grew significantly faster than LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVRLFMCUJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCUJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NNUP1.750.16
+10.06%
Nocopi Technologies, Inc.
AFSIM15.250.25
+1.67%
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc.
ELFIF11.750.02
+0.17%
E L Financial Ltd
NEXPF6.09N/A
N/A
NEXI S.P.A.
ORYZF3.22N/A
N/A
Oryzon Genomics SA

LVRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LVRLF and GNMLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVRLF and GNMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVRLF
1D Price
Change %
LVRLF100%
-8.29%
GNMLF - LVRLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCUJF - LVRLF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPSEY - LVRLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEDIF - LVRLF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
KSPHF - LVRLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCUJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCUJF and PAIOF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCUJF and PAIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCUJF
1D Price
Change %
MCUJF100%
N/A
PAIOF - MCUJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVRLF - MCUJF
14%
Poorly correlated
-8.29%
MVMDF - MCUJF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
MGWFF - MCUJF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEDXF - MCUJF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
More