Ad is loading...
LW
Price
$75.47
Change
-$4.94 (-6.14%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
46 days until earnings call
POST
Price
$106.14
Change
-$1.64 (-1.52%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LW vs POST

Header iconLW vs POST Comparison
Open Charts LW vs POSTBanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$75.47
Change-$4.94 (-6.14%)
Volume$4.4M
CapitalizationN/A
Post Holdings
Price$106.14
Change-$1.64 (-1.52%)
Volume$1.45M
CapitalizationN/A
LW vs POST Comparison Chart
Loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
POST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LW vs. POST commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a Sell and POST is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LW: $75.47 vs. POST: $106.14)
Brand notoriety: LW and POST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LW: 175% vs. POST: 316%
Market capitalization -- LW: $15.38B vs. POST: $6.45B
LW [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $15.38B. POST’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $6.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • POST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than POST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • POST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, POST is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -7.06% price change this week, while POST (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.

POST is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than POST($6.45B). POST has higher P/E ratio than LW: POST (22.68) vs LW (13.62). POST YTD gains are higher at: 20.531 vs. LW (-28.865). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. POST (1.13B). LW has less debt than POST: LW (3.63B) vs POST (6.32B). POST has higher revenues than LW: POST (7.39B) vs LW (6.35B).
LWPOSTLW / POST
Capitalization15.4B6.45B239%
EBITDA1.34B1.13B119%
Gain YTD-28.86520.531-141%
P/E Ratio13.6222.6860%
Revenue6.35B7.39B86%
Total CashN/A151M-
Total Debt3.63B6.32B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs POST: Fundamental Ratings
LW
POST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8752
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8620
SMR RATING
1..100
2673
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3752
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7543

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (47) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (86). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (86). This means that POST’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (26) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (73). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as POST (58). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to POST’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as POST (52). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to POST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWPOST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
POST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGX12.020.01
+0.08%
Invesco Preferred ETF
TYD24.300.01
+0.04%
Direxion Daily 7-10 Yr Trs Bull 3X ETF
VUSE59.50-0.82
-1.36%
Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
GTEK31.75-0.59
-1.82%
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Eq ETF
SSPX27.44-0.77
-2.73%
Janus Henderson US Sustainable Eq ETF

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
-6.14%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
POST - LW
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
USNA - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
More