LW
Price
$54.74
Change
+$0.83 (+1.54%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
108 days until earnings call
POST
Price
$116.93
Change
+$1.35 (+1.17%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
6.45B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LW vs POST

Header iconLW vs POST Comparison
Open Charts LW vs POSTBanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$54.74
Change+$0.83 (+1.54%)
Volume$2.21M
Capitalization15.38B
Post Holdings
Price$116.93
Change+$1.35 (+1.17%)
Volume$705.05K
Capitalization6.45B
LW vs POST Comparison Chart
Loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LW vs. POST commentary
Apr 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a StrongBuy and POST is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 13, 2025
Stock price -- (LW: $54.74 vs. POST: $116.93)
Brand notoriety: LW and POST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LW: 72% vs. POST: 100%
Market capitalization -- LW: $15.38B vs. POST: $6.45B
LW [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $15.38B. POST’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $6.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • POST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than POST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LW’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • POST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than POST.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -7.22% price change this week, while POST (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

POST is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.30% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than POST($6.45B). POST has higher P/E ratio than LW: POST (22.68) vs LW (13.62). POST YTD gains are higher at: 2.158 vs. LW (-17.596). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. POST (1.13B). LW has less debt than POST: LW (3.63B) vs POST (6.32B). POST has higher revenues than LW: POST (7.39B) vs LW (6.35B).
LWPOSTLW / POST
Capitalization15.4B6.45B239%
EBITDA1.34B1.13B119%
Gain YTD-17.5962.158-815%
P/E Ratio13.6222.6860%
Revenue6.35B7.39B86%
Total CashN/A151M-
Total Debt3.63B6.32B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs POST: Fundamental Ratings
LW
POST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1766
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
773
SMR RATING
1..100
4168
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
754
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (38) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (85). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (77). This means that POST’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (41) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as POST (68). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to POST’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (60). This means that POST’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (54). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWPOST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FILL21.350.59
+2.86%
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
VWID28.510.74
+2.66%
Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF
COMT24.470.32
+1.33%
iShares GSCI Cmd Dyn Roll Stgy ETF
DIVO39.380.49
+1.26%
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
HYGW30.570.18
+0.59%
iShares High Yld Crp Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF