LW
Price
$55.48
Change
+$0.24 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.38B
53 days until earnings call
THS
Price
$22.23
Change
+$0.39 (+1.79%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.08B
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LW vs THS

Header iconLW vs THS Comparison
Open Charts LW vs THSBanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$55.48
Change+$0.24 (+0.43%)
Volume$530
Capitalization15.38B
Treehouse Foods
Price$22.23
Change+$0.39 (+1.79%)
Volume$159
Capitalization2.08B
LW vs THS Comparison Chart
Loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LW vs. THS commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a StrongBuy and THS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LW: $55.24 vs. THS: $21.84)
Brand notoriety: LW and THS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LW: 47% vs. THS: 62%
Market capitalization -- LW: $15.38B vs. THS: $2.08B
LW [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $15.38B. THS’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • THS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than THS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • THS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than THS.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while THS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

THS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.72% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than THS($2.08B). THS has higher P/E ratio than LW: THS (36.86) vs LW (13.62). LW YTD gains are higher at: -16.249 vs. THS (-37.831). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. THS (300M). THS has less debt than LW: THS (1.6B) vs LW (3.63B). LW has higher revenues than THS: LW (6.35B) vs THS (3.43B).
LWTHSLW / THS
Capitalization15.4B2.08B739%
EBITDA1.34B300M448%
Gain YTD-16.249-37.83143%
P/E Ratio13.6236.8637%
Revenue6.35B3.43B185%
Total CashN/A320M-
Total Debt3.63B1.6B227%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs THS: Fundamental Ratings
LW
THS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1566
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99100
SMR RATING
1..100
4289
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6088
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
104
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (37) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THS (92) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than THS’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as THS (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to THS’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THS (89) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than THS’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as THS (88) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to THS’s over the last 12 months.

THS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (10) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that THS’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWTHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FACNX74.77N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Canada A
TSPIX5.95N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Growth I2
JLPCX15.26N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus C
HLIEX24.39N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Income I
EVUCX19.84N/A
N/A
Allspring Util and Telecomms C

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+0.04%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
POST - LW
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
KHC - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
SMPL - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
THS - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
More

THS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THS has been loosely correlated with CPB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THS jumps, then CPB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THS
1D Price
Change %
THS100%
-0.55%
CPB - THS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
KHC - THS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
SJM - THS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
CAG - THS
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
FLO - THS
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More