LW
Price
$60.08
Change
+$1.01 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
74 days until earnings call
USNA
Price
$34.02
Change
-$0.10 (-0.29%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
933.16M
23 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LW vs USNA

Header iconLW vs USNA Comparison
Open Charts LW vs USNABanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$60.08
Change+$1.01 (+1.71%)
Volume$1.96M
Capitalization15.38B
USANA Health Sciences
Price$34.02
Change-$0.10 (-0.29%)
Volume$96.63K
Capitalization933.16M
LW vs USNA Comparison Chart
Loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LW vs. USNA commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a Hold and USNA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (LW: $60.08 vs. USNA: $34.02)
Brand notoriety: LW and USNA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LW: 73% vs. USNA: 91%
Market capitalization -- LW: $15.38B vs. USNA: $933.16M
LW [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $15.38B. USNA’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $933.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSNA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USNA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than USNA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USNA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • USNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USNA is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.07% price change this week, while USNA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.

USNA is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.73% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than USNA($933M). USNA has higher P/E ratio than LW: USNA (14.53) vs LW (13.62). USNA YTD gains are higher at: -5.210 vs. LW (-10.100). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. USNA (123M). USNA has less debt than LW: USNA (8.06M) vs LW (3.63B). LW has higher revenues than USNA: LW (6.35B) vs USNA (921M).
LWUSNALW / USNA
Capitalization15.4B933M1,651%
EBITDA1.34B123M1,093%
Gain YTD-10.100-5.210194%
P/E Ratio13.6214.5394%
Revenue6.35B921M689%
Total CashN/A330M-
Total Debt3.63B8.06M45,015%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs USNA: Fundamental Ratings
LW
USNA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6369
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4266
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6579
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1380
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (44) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USNA (82) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than USNA’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as USNA (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to USNA’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as USNA (66) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to USNA’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as USNA (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to USNA’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for USNA (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LW’s stock grew significantly faster than USNA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWUSNA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSVR7.910.27
+3.53%
Reservoir Media
CYCC0.36N/A
+0.99%
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals
LNW90.040.79
+0.89%
Light & Wonder
FUN44.38-0.08
-0.18%
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
SILC16.89-0.30
-1.72%
Silicom Ltd

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+1.71%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.91%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
USNA - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
FLO - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
More

USNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USNA has been loosely correlated with CENT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USNA jumps, then CENT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USNA
1D Price
Change %
USNA100%
-0.29%
CENT - USNA
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
CENTA - USNA
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
AJINF - USNA
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HLF - USNA
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
WEST - USNA
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
More