LWSCF
Price
$11.02
Change
-$0.18 (-1.61%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
MFCSF
Price
$10.99
Change
-$0.03 (-0.27%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LWSCF vs MFCSF

Header iconLWSCF vs MFCSF Comparison
Open Charts LWSCF vs MFCSFBanner chart's image
Sienna Sr Living
Price$11.02
Change-$0.18 (-1.61%)
Volume$5.14K
CapitalizationN/A
Medical Facilities
Price$10.99
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
Volume$6.11K
CapitalizationN/A
LWSCF vs MFCSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LWSCF vs. MFCSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LWSCF is a Hold and MFCSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LWSCF: $11.02 vs. MFCSF: $10.99)
Brand notoriety: LWSCF and MFCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LWSCF: 242% vs. MFCSF: 83%
Market capitalization -- LWSCF: $631.7M vs. MFCSF: $164.47M
LWSCF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $631.7M. MFCSF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $164.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LWSCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LWSCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFCSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFCSF is a better buy in the long-term than LWSCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LWSCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFCSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LWSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFCSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFCSF is a better buy in the short-term than LWSCF.

Price Growth

LWSCF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -5.63% price change this week, while MFCSF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFCSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-4.34% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LWSCF($632M) has a higher market cap than MFCSF($164M). LWSCF has higher P/E ratio than MFCSF: LWSCF (76.92) vs MFCSF (23.87). MFCSF YTD gains are higher at: 62.059 vs. LWSCF (29.675). LWSCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 63.9M vs. MFCSF (56M). MFCSF has more cash in the bank: 35.3M vs. LWSCF (30.4M). MFCSF has less debt than LWSCF: MFCSF (139M) vs LWSCF (999M). LWSCF has higher revenues than MFCSF: LWSCF (736M) vs MFCSF (433M).
LWSCFMFCSFLWSCF / MFCSF
Capitalization632M164M385%
EBITDA63.9M56M114%
Gain YTD29.67562.05948%
P/E Ratio76.9223.87322%
Revenue736M433M170%
Total Cash30.4M35.3M86%
Total Debt999M139M719%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LWSCF vs MFCSF: Fundamental Ratings
LWSCF
MFCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9166
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10015
SMR RATING
1..100
8938
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9827
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFCSF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (20). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LWSCF (100). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LWSCF (89). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (54). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LWSCF (98). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWSCFMFCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMRDF0.260.01
+5.24%
Radisson Mining Resources Inc.
SFRGY3.580.09
+2.58%
Salvatore Ferragamo S.P.A.
SGPYY66.650.58
+0.88%
Sage Group plc (The)
CICHY16.00-0.05
-0.31%
China Construction Bank Corp.
FANUY13.04-0.06
-0.46%
Fanuc Corporation

LWSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LWSCF and ASTH have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWSCF and ASTH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LWSCF
1D Price
Change %
LWSCF100%
N/A
ASTH - LWSCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.47%
MFCSF - LWSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
LTGHY - LWSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
HLYK - LWSCF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWKHY - LWSCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCSF and LWSCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCSF and LWSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCSF
1D Price
Change %
MFCSF100%
-2.26%
LWSCF - MFCSF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLYK - MFCSF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORPEF - MFCSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTGHY - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
KJFI - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More