LWSCF
Price
$13.17
Change
-$0.22 (-1.64%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
631.7M
MFCSF
Price
$10.91
Change
-$0.09 (-0.82%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
164.47M
12 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LWSCF vs MFCSF

Header iconLWSCF vs MFCSF Comparison
Open Charts LWSCF vs MFCSFBanner chart's image
Sienna Sr Living
Price$13.17
Change-$0.22 (-1.64%)
Volume$275.4K
Capitalization631.7M
Medical Facilities
Price$10.91
Change-$0.09 (-0.82%)
Volume$650
Capitalization164.47M
LWSCF vs MFCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LWSCF vs. MFCSF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LWSCF is a Hold and MFCSF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LWSCF: $13.17 vs. MFCSF: $10.91)
Brand notoriety: LWSCF and MFCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LWSCF: 23% vs. MFCSF: 29%
Market capitalization -- LWSCF: $631.7M vs. MFCSF: $164.47M
LWSCF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $631.7M. MFCSF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $164.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LWSCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LWSCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFCSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LWSCF is a better buy in the long-term than MFCSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LWSCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFCSF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LWSCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MFCSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LWSCF is a better buy in the short-term than MFCSF.

Price Growth

LWSCF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -3.02% price change this week, while MFCSF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFCSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.10% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LWSCF($632M) has a higher market cap than MFCSF($164M). LWSCF has higher P/E ratio than MFCSF: LWSCF (76.92) vs MFCSF (23.87). LWSCF YTD gains are higher at: 21.103 vs. MFCSF (1.427). LWSCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 63.9M vs. MFCSF (56M). MFCSF has more cash in the bank: 35.3M vs. LWSCF (30.4M). MFCSF has less debt than LWSCF: MFCSF (139M) vs LWSCF (999M). LWSCF has higher revenues than MFCSF: LWSCF (736M) vs MFCSF (433M).
LWSCFMFCSFLWSCF / MFCSF
Capitalization632M164M385%
EBITDA63.9M56M114%
Gain YTD21.1031.4271,479%
P/E Ratio76.9223.87322%
Revenue736M433M170%
Total Cash30.4M35.3M86%
Total Debt999M139M719%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LWSCF vs MFCSF: Fundamental Ratings
LWSCF
MFCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9355
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4320
SMR RATING
1..100
8913
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4796
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFCSF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (24). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (43). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LWSCF (89). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCSF (59). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew similarly to MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFCSF (96). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWSCFMFCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNFGX44.260.15
+0.34%
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth N
SRICX12.04N/A
N/A
Gabelli SRI C
FCTGX29.21N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth M
MUIFX33.16N/A
N/A
Nationwide Institutional Service
AWSCX15.64N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Core Equity C

LWSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LWSCF and ASTH have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWSCF and ASTH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LWSCF
1D Price
Change %
LWSCF100%
-1.64%
ASTH - LWSCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
MFCSF - LWSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
LTGHY - LWSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-4.44%
HLYK - LWSCF
10%
Poorly correlated
-8.33%
NWKHY - LWSCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCSF and LWSCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCSF and LWSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCSF
1D Price
Change %
MFCSF100%
-0.79%
LWSCF - MFCSF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
HLYK - MFCSF
9%
Poorly correlated
-8.33%
ORPEF - MFCSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTGHY - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.44%
KJFI - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More