LYFT
Price
$15.72
Change
-$0.13 (-0.82%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.74B
30 days until earnings call
SANG
Price
$5.97
Change
+$0.23 (+4.01%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
160.31M
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYFT vs SANG

Header iconLYFT vs SANG Comparison
Open Charts LYFT vs SANGBanner chart's image
Lyft
Price$15.72
Change-$0.13 (-0.82%)
Volume$19.65M
Capitalization7.74B
Sangoma Technologies
Price$5.97
Change+$0.23 (+4.01%)
Volume$513
Capitalization160.31M
LYFT vs SANG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYFT vs. SANG commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYFT is a Buy and SANG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LYFT: $15.72 vs. SANG: $5.97)
Brand notoriety: LYFT: Notable vs. SANG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYFT: 116% vs. SANG: 10%
Market capitalization -- LYFT: $7.74B vs. SANG: $160.31M
LYFT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.74B. SANG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $160.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LYFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SANG is a better buy in the long-term than LYFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LYFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LYFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +8.19% price change this week, while SANG (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.07% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYFT($7.74B) has a higher market cap than SANG($160M). LYFT YTD gains are higher at: 21.860 vs. SANG (-16.325). SANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.5M vs. LYFT (-188.97M). LYFT has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. SANG (10.6M). SANG has less debt than LYFT: SANG (105M) vs LYFT (1.04B). LYFT has higher revenues than SANG: LYFT (4.4B) vs SANG (252M).
LYFTSANGLYFT / SANG
Capitalization7.74B160M4,835%
EBITDA-188.97M17.5M-1,080%
Gain YTD21.860-16.325-134%
P/E RatioN/A909.09-
Revenue4.4B252M1,748%
Total Cash1.69B10.6M15,896%
Total Debt1.04B105M992%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYFT vs SANG: Fundamental Ratings
LYFT
SANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9754
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYFT's Valuation (75) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SANG (95) in the null industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SANG (100) in the null industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's SMR Rating (75) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SANG (90) in the null industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SANG (45) in the null industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to SANG’s over the last 12 months.

SANG's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYFT (97) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that SANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUEUX37.690.23
+0.61%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity R4
ITHIX43.680.26
+0.60%
Hartford Capital Appreciation I
TLAFX11.630.06
+0.52%
Transamerica Large Core ESG R4
WFSAX27.490.06
+0.22%
Allspring Small Company Growth A
IASMX17.48-0.01
-0.06%
Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus

LYFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYFT has been loosely correlated with EVCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LYFT jumps, then EVCM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYFT
1D Price
Change %
LYFT100%
-0.82%
EVCM - LYFT
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
UBER - LYFT
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
COIN - LYFT
51%
Loosely correlated
-5.77%
QTWO - LYFT
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
FRSH - LYFT
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

SANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SANG and BTSGU have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SANG and BTSGU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANG
1D Price
Change %
SANG100%
N/A
BTSGU - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
LYFT - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
OCFT - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
CORZ - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
S - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
More