LZ
Price
$10.72
Change
+$0.05 (+0.47%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.93B
80 days until earnings call
MG
Price
$9.06
Change
+$0.04 (+0.44%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
285.73M
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LZ vs MG

Header iconLZ vs MG Comparison
Open Charts LZ vs MGBanner chart's image
LegalZoom.com
Price$10.72
Change+$0.05 (+0.47%)
Volume$2.16M
Capitalization1.93B
Mistras Group
Price$9.06
Change+$0.04 (+0.44%)
Volume$132.91K
Capitalization285.73M
LZ vs MG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LZ vs. MG commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZ is a Hold and MG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (LZ: $10.72 vs. MG: $9.06)
Brand notoriety: LZ and MG are both not notable
LZ represents the Office Equipment/Supplies, while MG is part of the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LZ: 102% vs. MG: 98%
Market capitalization -- LZ: $1.93B vs. MG: $285.73M
LZ [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $1.93B. MG’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $285.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.79B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LZ is a better buy in the long-term than MG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LZ is a better buy in the short-term than MG.

Price Growth

LZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -2.37% price change this week, while MG (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +3.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +23.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.31% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+23.33% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LZ($1.93B) has a higher market cap than MG($286M). LZ has higher P/E ratio than MG: LZ (67.00) vs MG (24.49). LZ YTD gains are higher at: 42.743 vs. MG (0.000). LZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 86M vs. MG (67.1M). LZ has more cash in the bank: 210M vs. MG (18.5M). LZ has less debt than MG: LZ (14.6M) vs MG (205M). MG (707M) and LZ (691M) have equivalent revenues.
LZMGLZ / MG
Capitalization1.93B286M676%
EBITDA86M67.1M128%
Gain YTD42.7430.000-
P/E Ratio67.0024.49274%
Revenue691M707M98%
Total Cash210M18.5M1,135%
Total Debt14.6M205M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MG: Fundamental Ratings
MG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
75
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIOPX31.460.35
+1.13%
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp A
PEEAX14.95-0.01
-0.07%
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth A
AUERX15.01-0.01
-0.07%
Auer Growth
DESUX24.70-0.11
-0.44%
DWS ESG Core Equity R6
JMVYX37.66-0.24
-0.63%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value R6

LZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZ has been loosely correlated with UDMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZ jumps, then UDMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZ
1D Price
Change %
LZ100%
+0.47%
UDMY - LZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
DNB - LZ
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ARLO - LZ
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
MSA - LZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
BRC - LZ
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More