LZ
Price
$9.12
Change
+$0.09 (+1.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.52B
33 days until earnings call
Z
Price
$72.53
Change
+$1.53 (+2.15%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.21B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LZ vs Z

Header iconLZ vs Z Comparison
Open Charts LZ vs ZBanner chart's image
LegalZoom.com
Price$9.12
Change+$0.09 (+1.00%)
Volume$574.24K
Capitalization2.52B
Zillow Group
Price$72.53
Change+$1.53 (+2.15%)
Volume$1.28M
Capitalization11.21B
LZ vs Z Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LZ vs. Z commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZ is a StrongBuy and Z is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LZ: $9.12 vs. Z: $72.53)
Brand notoriety: LZ: Not notable vs. Z: Notable
LZ represents the Miscellaneous Commercial Services, while Z is part of the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LZ: 31% vs. Z: 66%
Market capitalization -- LZ: $2.52B vs. Z: $11.21B
LZ [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.52B. Z’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $11.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $1.94T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.62B. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $70.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • Z’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, Z is a better buy in the long-term than LZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while Z’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • Z’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, Z is a better buy in the short-term than LZ.

Price Growth

LZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +5.43% price change this week, while Z (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +4.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.27%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Z is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.55% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

@Internet Software/Services (+3.80% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
Z($11.2B) has a higher market cap than LZ($2.52B). LZ has higher P/E ratio than Z: LZ (191.57) vs Z (129.87). LZ YTD gains are higher at: 21.438 vs. Z (-2.053). Z has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 104M vs. LZ (60.1M). Z has more cash in the bank: 2.81B vs. LZ (226M). LZ has less debt than Z: LZ (9.02M) vs Z (1.83B). Z has higher revenues than LZ: Z (1.95B) vs LZ (661M).
LZZLZ / Z
Capitalization2.52B11.2B23%
EBITDA60.1M104M58%
Gain YTD21.438-2.053-1,044%
P/E Ratio191.57129.87148%
Revenue661M1.95B34%
Total Cash226M2.81B8%
Total Debt9.02M1.83B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
Z: Fundamental Ratings
Z
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRWCX25.220.27
+1.08%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq C
CLFFX21.200.13
+0.62%
Clifford Capital Partners Investor
FSNIX16.750.05
+0.30%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
CFCYX14.310.04
+0.28%
Columbia Flexible Capital Income Inst3
RUBUSD0.01N/A
N/A
Russia Ruble - United States Dollar

LZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZ has been loosely correlated with DNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZ jumps, then DNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZ
1D Price
Change %
LZ100%
+1.00%
DNB - LZ
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ARLO - LZ
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.96%
UDMY - LZ
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
EXPO - LZ
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
GPN - LZ
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More

Z and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, Z has been closely correlated with ZG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if Z jumps, then ZG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To Z
1D Price
Change %
Z100%
+2.15%
ZG - Z
100%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
CARG - Z
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
SNAP - Z
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
META - Z
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OPRA - Z
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More