At first glance, a stock comparison between Z and ZG may seem unusual, because both tickers track the same underlying company: Zillow Group, Inc., the most visited real estate platform in the United States. The distinction lies in share class rather than business fundamentals. This comparison is most relevant to investors weighing voting rights against price, and to traders assessing relative performance, liquidity, and market positioning between two nearly identical securities. Understanding how these share classes diverge—and how they move together—can help both retail and institutional participants make more informed allocation decisions in the current housing-market environment.
Z is the ticker for Zillow Group's Class C capital stock, which carries no voting rights. These shares were distributed to existing holders in 2015, giving the company a currency for acquisitions and employee compensation without diluting founder control. In recent weeks, Z has traded in the low $30 range, near its 52-week low, reflecting a challenging macro backdrop rather than deterioration in the core business. Sentiment has been pressured by softer housing activity as borrowing costs stay elevated and by analyst price-target reductions from firms such as Wells Fargo and Morgan Stanley. Even so, recent trading has shown bouts of relief buying, particularly when mortgage yields ease. Because Z is the non-voting class, it frequently trades at a slight discount to its voting counterpart.
ZG is the ticker for Zillow Group's Class A common stock, which carries one vote per share. Like Z, it grants exposure to the same operating business, spanning Residential, Mortgages, Rentals, and other segments. In recent weeks, ZG has also traded near its 52-week low, moving largely in lockstep with Z but typically holding a small premium attributable to voting rights and differing supply and liquidity. The stock has faced the same headwinds: a subdued for-sale housing market, high mortgage rates, and litigation costs tied to an ongoing FTC (Federal Trade Commission) matter. However, the company's most recent results showed revenue growth of roughly 18% year over year, accelerating rentals and mortgage volumes, and expanding free cash flow, which has supported a constructive long-term analyst view despite near-term volatility.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's best-performing automated strategies. Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots covering thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and statistics. Because market conditions shift constantly, only the most suitable and highest-conviction bots earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. This selection helps investors identify strategies that are currently aligned with prevailing market dynamics, whether trend-following, mean-reversion, or volatility-based. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can give you a practical way to monitor how automated systems are positioning across the market today.
The core contrast between Z and ZG is governance, not growth. ZG holders can vote on matters such as board elections, while Z holders cannot. In practice, this creates a narrow price spread that can widen or narrow with market sentiment, liquidity flows, and index-inclusion dynamics. On fundamentals, the two are identical: both reflect Zillow's push into an end-to-end housing "super app," with growth driven by rentals, Zillow Home Loans, and emerging AI-powered search tools. Risk factors are also shared, including a flat housing market, elevated mortgage rates, and legal expenses. For momentum-oriented traders, Z often offers greater relative liquidity and slightly lower entry prices; for long-term shareholders who value influence, ZG provides voting participation at a modest premium.
From a purely technical and positioning standpoint, Tickeron's AI would likely treat Z and ZG as highly correlated instruments with near-identical trend profiles. Given the absence of a meaningful fundamental gap, the AI would probably favor the share class demonstrating marginally stronger trend consistency, tighter relative strength, and better liquidity characteristics in any given period. Historically, Z has tended to offer higher trading volume and a slightly lower entry cost, which can make it a marginally more efficient vehicle for systematic strategies. That said, the divergence is usually small, and the AI would likely frame its preference as probabilistic rather than definitive, contingent on prevailing momentum, spread behavior, and broader housing-market catalysts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To understand the difference between Zillow Group Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class C (Z) vs. Zillow Group Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A (ZG) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class C and Ordinary Shares - Class A
Ordinary Shares - Class C - Ordinary shares Class C usually refers to ordinary shares with no-voting rights (except for the cases described in the company's reports) . Investors of Class C shares are not entitled to offer a proposal to make a merger, takeover, or other change of control proposal, or to engage in a proxy contest for the election of directors. The issuance of shares Class C won't result in voting dilution to the holders of shares Class A and B. The holders of Class C stock will be entitled to share equally with the holders of Class A Stock and Class B Stock any dividends that the company may authorize.
Ordinary Shares - Class A - Class A shares usually refer to common stocks with more voting rights than Class B shares. They often imply enhanced benefits such as dividend priority and liquidation preferences to the holder. Traditionally, this type of share helps a company's management to keep control over the company.
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where Z declined for three days, in 266 of 328 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for Z moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 27 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 21 of the 27 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 78%.
Z broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 45 of 63 cases where Z's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on Z as a result. In 62 of 84 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for Z just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where Z's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 36 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Z moved above its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for Z crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 27, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
Following a +12.48% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where Z advanced for three days, in 223 of 303 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 146 of 199 cases where Z Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 73%.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 37 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. Z’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 93 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.770) is normal, around the industry mean (1.069). P/E Ratio (147.391) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-42.791). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.932) is also within normal values, averaging (17.274). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.985) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.720) is also within normal values, averaging (71.888).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. Z’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
The 10-day RSI Oscillator for ZG moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 23 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 20 of the 23 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 87%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ZG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
ZG broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 47 of 61 cases where ZG's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ZG as a result. In 56 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ZG just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where ZG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
ZG moved above its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for ZG crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 27, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 14 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Following a +12.41% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ZG advanced for three days, in 218 of 301 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 150 of 204 cases where ZG Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 74%.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 37 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ZG’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 94 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.798) is normal, around the industry mean (1.069). P/E Ratio (149.783) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-42.791). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.920) is also within normal values, averaging (17.274). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.985) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.780) is also within normal values, averaging (71.888).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ZG’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
Z | ZG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
Z's Valuation (93) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZG (94). This means that Z’s stock grew similarly to ZG’s over the last 12 months.
Z's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZG (100). This means that Z’s stock grew similarly to ZG’s over the last 12 months.
Z's SMR Rating (89) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZG (89). This means that Z’s stock grew similarly to ZG’s over the last 12 months.
Z's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZG (62). This means that Z’s stock grew similarly to ZG’s over the last 12 months.
Z's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZG (95). This means that Z’s stock grew similarly to ZG’s over the last 12 months.
| Z | ZG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 74% | 22 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 9 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 74% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
Z’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while ZG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
Z’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
Z (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +10.17% price change this week, while ZG (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +8.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.51%.
Z is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2027.
ZG is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2027.
Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, Z has been closely correlated with ZG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if Z jumps, then ZG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZG has been closely correlated with Z. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZG jumps, then Z could also see price increases.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TOPT | 34.41 | 0.62 | +1.83% |
| iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) | |||
| SCZ | 84.18 | 1.24 | +1.50% |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) | |||
| RTRE | 24.02 | 0.11 | +0.46% |
| Rareview Total Return Bond ETF (RTRE) | |||
| LOUP | 70.76 | -2.79 | -3.79% |
| Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) | |||
| CIEG | 2.12 | -0.51 | -19.39% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long CIEN Daily ETF (CIEG) | |||