Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDRX
LZFIX vs TEDRX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDRX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$9.13
Change+$0.17 (+1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.34M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R
Price$32.08
Change+$0.53 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.51B
LZFIX vs TEDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDRX commentary
Aug 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a StrongBuy and TEDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.51B vs. LZFIX (48.3M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDRX: LZFIX (2.20) vs TEDRX (1.53). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDRX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDRX (24 years). TEDRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDRX (34.55). TEDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDRX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. LZFIX (-8.67). TEDRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. LZFIX (16.68).
| LZFIX | TEDRX | LZFIX / TEDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.635 | 17.855 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.3M | 9.51B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 1.53 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.67 | 4.41 | -196% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.12 | 17.84 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.68 | 37.90 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers