Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDRX
LZFIX vs TEDRX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDRX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$8.83
Change-$0.03 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.94M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R
Price$31.83
Change-$0.12 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.53B
LZFIX vs TEDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDRX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Buy and TEDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.53B vs. LZFIX (46.9M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDRX: LZFIX (2.19) vs TEDRX (1.44). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDRX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDRX (24 years). TEDRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDRX (34.55). TEDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDRX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.00 vs. LZFIX (-12.14). TEDRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.11 vs. LZFIX (7.99).
| LZFIX | TEDRX | LZFIX / TEDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.393 | 17.377 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9M | 9.53B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.44 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.14 | 4.00 | -303% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.61 | 32.51 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.99 | 36.11 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement