Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDRX
LZFIX vs TEDRX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDRX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$9.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.12M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R
Price$30.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
LZFIX vs TEDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDRX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a StrongBuy and TEDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. LZFIX (47.1M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDRX: LZFIX (2.13) vs TEDRX (1.55). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDRX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDRX (23 years). TEDRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDRX (34.55). TEDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDRX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.81 vs. LZFIX (-0.34). TEDRX return over 5 years is better than : 24.60 vs. LZFIX (15.01).
| LZFIX | TEDRX | LZFIX / TEDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.565 | 10.764 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.1M | 9.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.55 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.34 | 0.81 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.26 | 2.65 | -350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.01 | 24.60 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -4.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers