Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDSX
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$7.78
Change-$0.08 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.07M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.68
Change-$0.15 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. LZFIX (41.1M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFIX (2.27) vs TEDSX (0.75). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.97 vs. LZFIX (-19.83). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.13 vs. LZFIX (-13.30).
| LZFIX | TEDSX | LZFIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.576 | 13.395 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 9.13B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 0.75 | 301% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.83 | 1.97 | -1,004% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.74 | 14.16 | -132% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.30 | 22.13 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers