Ad is loading...
LZFIX vs TEDSX
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$8.76
Change-$0.06 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.23M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$30.23
Change-$0.23 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.16B
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.16B vs. LZFIX (148M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFIX (2.29) vs TEDSX (0.40). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFIX (7 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. TEDSX (35.47). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.37 vs. LZFIX (-9.11). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 3.39 vs. LZFIX (-5.62).
| LZFIX | TEDSX | LZFIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.162 | 7.695 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 9.16B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 0.40 | 575% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.11 | 0.37 | -2,467% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.47 | -1.57 | 860% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.62 | 3.39 | -166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -7.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers