Ad is loading...
LZFIX vs TEDSX
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$8.32
Change+$0.05 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.83M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$28.88
Change+$0.21 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 8.89B vs. LZFIX (173M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFIX (2.29) vs TEDSX (0.40). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFIX (7 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. TEDSX (35.47). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.26 vs. LZFIX (-11.53). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : -4.16 vs. LZFIX (-13.38).
| LZFIX | TEDSX | LZFIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.120 | 2.886 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173M | 8.89B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 0.40 | 575% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.53 | -1.26 | 918% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.20 | -9.37 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.38 | -4.16 | 321% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -6.83 | - |