Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDSX
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$8.83
Change-$0.08 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.44M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.84
Change-$0.22 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.39B
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.39B vs. LZFIX (46.4M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFIX (2.15) vs TEDSX (0.86). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.11 vs. LZFIX (-13.45). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 35.70 vs. LZFIX (12.45).
| LZFIX | TEDSX | LZFIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.033 | 16.993 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4M | 9.39B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 0.86 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.45 | 4.11 | -327% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.96 | 19.30 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.45 | 35.70 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement