Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDSX
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$9.13
Change+$0.17 (+1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.34M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.97
Change+$0.54 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.51B
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Aug 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a StrongBuy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.51B vs. LZFIX (48.3M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFIX (2.20) vs TEDSX (0.90). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.16 vs. LZFIX (-8.67). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. LZFIX (16.68).
| LZFIX | TEDSX | LZFIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.635 | 17.456 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.3M | 9.51B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 0.90 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.67 | 4.16 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.12 | 17.54 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.68 | 37.34 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement