Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDSX
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$9.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.12M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.07
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a StrongBuy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. LZFIX (47.1M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFIX (2.13) vs TEDSX (0.91). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.55 vs. LZFIX (-0.34). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 24.13 vs. LZFIX (15.01).
| LZFIX | TEDSX | LZFIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.565 | 10.509 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.1M | 9.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.91 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.34 | 0.55 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.26 | 2.42 | -383% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.01 | 24.13 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -4.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers