Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFIX vs TEDSX
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFIX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$9.63
Change+$0.11 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.12M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.57
Change+$0.17 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.19B
LZFIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFIX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.19B vs. LZFIX (47.1M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFIX (2.13) vs TEDSX (0.91). LZFIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFIX (8 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LZFIX (0.94). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFIX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFIX (10000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.10 vs. LZFIX (2.62). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 38.38 vs. LZFIX (31.26).
| LZFIX | TEDSX | LZFIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.286 | 11.863 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.1M | 9.19B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.91 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.62 | 3.10 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.94 | 11.75 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.26 | 38.38 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers