Ad is loading...
LZFOX vs TEDSX
LZFOX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFOX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Open Shares
Price$8.40
Change-$0.04 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.34M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$29.11
Change-$0.06 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.98B
LZFOX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFOX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFOX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 8.98B vs. LZFOX (175M). LZFOX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFOX (2.04) vs TEDSX (0.40). LZFOX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFOX (7 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). LZFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. TEDSX (35.47). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFOX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFOX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.31 vs. LZFOX (-11.92). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : -1.39 vs. LZFOX (-12.57).
| LZFOX | TEDSX | LZFOX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.840 | 3.705 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 8.98B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 0.40 | 513% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.92 | -1.31 | 914% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.54 | -6.00 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.57 | -1.39 | 904% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -7.87 | - |