Ad is loading...
LZFOX vs TEDSX
LZFOX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFOX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Open Shares
Price$8.75
Change-$0.06 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.23M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$30.23
Change-$0.23 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.16B
LZFOX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFOX vs. TEDSX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFOX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.16B vs. LZFOX (148M). LZFOX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFOX (2.04) vs TEDSX (0.40). LZFOX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFOX (7 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). LZFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. TEDSX (35.47). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFOX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFOX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.13 vs. LZFOX (-9.46). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 4.18 vs. LZFOX (-7.20).
| LZFOX | TEDSX | LZFOX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.042 | 8.514 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 9.16B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 0.40 | 513% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.46 | 1.13 | -835% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.15 | -0.82 | 1,731% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.20 | 4.18 | -172% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -6.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...