Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZFOX vs TEDSX
LZFOX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LZFOX vs TEDSX
Lazard Equity Franchise Open Shares
Price$7.75
Change-$0.09 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.07M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.68
Change-$0.15 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
LZFOX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZFOX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZFOX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. LZFOX (41.1M). LZFOX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LZFOX (2.02) vs TEDSX (0.75). LZFOX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LZFOX (8 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). LZFOX (3.21) is less costly to investors than TEDSX (1.96). LZFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZFOX: TEDSX (1000) vs LZFOX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.97 vs. LZFOX (-20.19). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.13 vs. LZFOX (-14.89).
| LZFOX | TEDSX | LZFOX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.96 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.21 | 1.96 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.936 | 13.395 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 9.13B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.75 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.19 | 1.97 | -1,023% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.51 | 14.16 | -138% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.89 | 22.13 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement