LZM
Price
$4.89
Change
+$0.28 (+6.07%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
387.76M
78 days until earnings call
NVA
Price
$12.16
Change
+$0.09 (+0.75%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
81.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LZM vs NVA

Header iconLZM vs NVA Comparison
Open Charts LZM vs NVABanner chart's image
Lifezone Metals
Price$4.89
Change+$0.28 (+6.07%)
Volume$205.62K
Capitalization387.76M
Nova Minerals
Price$12.16
Change+$0.09 (+0.75%)
Volume$62.16K
Capitalization81.37M
LZM vs NVA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LZM vs. NVA commentary
Sep 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZM is a Hold and NVA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2025
Stock price -- (LZM: $4.89 vs. NVA: $12.16)
Brand notoriety: LZM and NVA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LZM: 203% vs. NVA: 80%
Market capitalization -- LZM: $387.76M vs. NVA: $81.37M
LZM [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $387.76M. NVA’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $81.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LZM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNVA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NVA is a better buy in the long-term than LZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NVA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LZM and NVA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.54% price change this week, while NVA (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +138.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.30% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LZM($388M) has a higher market cap than NVA($81.4M). NVA YTD gains are higher at: -12.075 vs. LZM (-29.640).
LZMNVALZM / NVA
Capitalization388M81.4M477%
EBITDA-23.21MN/A-
Gain YTD-29.640-12.075245%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue416KN/A-
Total Cash12.5MN/A-
Total Debt31.4MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZMNVA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOME57.520.48
+0.84%
Somerset Trust Holding Co.
TKYMY10.87N/A
N/A
Tokuyama Corp.
BKKPF4.80N/A
N/A
Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd.
LMSQF0.14N/A
-1.82%
Latin Metals Inc.
ACGBY17.52-0.33
-1.85%
Agricultural Bank of China

LZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZM has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZM jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZM
1D Price
Change %
LZM100%
+6.07%
LAR - LZM
33%
Loosely correlated
+6.29%
RIO - LZM
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
LAC - LZM
32%
Poorly correlated
+11.89%
BHP - LZM
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
TECK - LZM
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More

NVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NVA and BHP have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVA and BHP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVA
1D Price
Change %
NVA100%
+0.75%
BHP - NVA
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
ATLX - NVA
13%
Poorly correlated
+4.37%
LAC - NVA
13%
Poorly correlated
+11.89%
LZM - NVA
7%
Poorly correlated
+6.07%
NEXM - NVA
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
More