It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LZM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRIO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LZM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RIO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.88% price change this week, while RIO (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.
LZM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.
RIO is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
LZM | RIO | LZM / RIO | |
Capitalization | 426M | 104B | 0% |
EBITDA | -23.21M | 22B | -0% |
Gain YTD | -22.734 | 18.110 | -126% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 10.42 | - |
Revenue | 416K | 53.7B | 0% |
Total Cash | 12.5M | 9.33B | 0% |
Total Debt | 31.4M | 23.6B | 0% |
RIO | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 31 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LZM | RIO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 2 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 9 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago59% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago64% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SHRY | 42.41 | -0.20 | -0.46% |
First Trust Bloomberg Shld Yld ETF | |||
LOUP | 72.85 | -0.43 | -0.59% |
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | |||
TOTR | 40.76 | -0.24 | -0.59% |
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF | |||
EFG | 112.02 | -1.03 | -0.91% |
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | |||
XUDV | 26.22 | -0.29 | -1.09% |
Franklin U.S. Dividend Mltplr Idx ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZM has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZM jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LZM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LZM | 100% | -1.10% | ||
LAR - LZM | 34% Loosely correlated | +11.63% | ||
RIO - LZM | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
BHP - LZM | 32% Poorly correlated | +4.09% | ||
SGML - LZM | 31% Poorly correlated | +9.92% | ||
CAMZF - LZM | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
More |