M
Price
$11.02
Change
+$0.22 (+2.04%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.07B
26 days until earnings call
MAKSF
Price
$4.99
Change
-$0.21 (-4.04%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.74B
Ad is loading...

M vs MAKSF

Header iconM vs MAKSF Comparison
Open Charts M vs MAKSFBanner chart's image
Macy's
Price$11.02
Change+$0.22 (+2.04%)
Volume$7.95M
Capitalization3.07B
Marks & Spencer Group
Price$4.99
Change-$0.21 (-4.04%)
Volume$31.4K
Capitalization10.74B
M vs MAKSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
M vs. MAKSF commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is M is a Buy and MAKSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (M: $11.02 vs. MAKSF: $4.99)
Brand notoriety: M: Notable vs. MAKSF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: M: 103% vs. MAKSF: 68%
Market capitalization -- M: $3.07B vs. MAKSF: $10.74B
M [@Department Stores] is valued at $3.07B. MAKSF’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $10.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $4.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

M’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAKSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • M’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAKSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAKSF is a better buy in the long-term than M.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

M’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • M’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

M (@Department Stores) experienced а -0.99% price change this week, while MAKSF (@Department Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

M is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (+1.86% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAKSF($10.7B) has a higher market cap than M($3.07B). MAKSF has higher P/E ratio than M: MAKSF (15.54) vs M (5.32). MAKSF YTD gains are higher at: 8.020 vs. M (-34.026). M has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. MAKSF (1.43B). M has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MAKSF (780M). MAKSF has less debt than M: MAKSF (2.88B) vs M (5.71B). M has higher revenues than MAKSF: M (23B) vs MAKSF (13.4B).
MMAKSFM / MAKSF
Capitalization3.07B10.7B29%
EBITDA1.76B1.43B123%
Gain YTD-34.0268.020-424%
P/E Ratio5.3215.5434%
Revenue23B13.4B172%
Total Cash1.31B780M167%
Total Debt5.71B2.88B198%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
M vs MAKSF: Fundamental Ratings
M
MAKSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5236
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7222
SMR RATING
1..100
5795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

M's Valuation (6) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAKSF (69) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAKSF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for M (72) in the Department Stores industry. This means that MAKSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than M’s over the last 12 months.

M's SMR Rating (57) in the Department Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAKSF (95) in the null industry. This means that M’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAKSF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for M (88) in the Department Stores industry. This means that MAKSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than M’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for M (100) in the Department Stores industry. This means that MAKSF’s stock grew significantly faster than M’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
M
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APHYX22.720.54
+2.43%
Artisan Developing World Institutional
CFNAX77.291.44
+1.90%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529A
GTSCX30.060.52
+1.76%
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Instl
DASVX12.37N/A
N/A
Dunham Small Cap Value A
EMRZX14.48N/A
N/A
VanEck Emerging Markets Z

M and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, M has been loosely correlated with KSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if M jumps, then KSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To M
1D Price
Change %
M100%
+2.04%
KSS - M
55%
Loosely correlated
+4.77%
DDS - M
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
JWN - M
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
MAKSY - M
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
SRGHY - M
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
More

MAKSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAKSF and DDS have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAKSF and DDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAKSF
1D Price
Change %
MAKSF100%
N/A
DDS - MAKSF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
JWN - MAKSF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
KSS - MAKSF
13%
Poorly correlated
+4.77%
HDVTY - MAKSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
M - MAKSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
More