MA
Price
$544.93
Change
-$1.54 (-0.28%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
489.34B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PYPL
Price
$61.83
Change
+$0.61 (+1.00%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
57.85B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MA vs PYPL

Header iconMA vs PYPL Comparison
Open Charts MA vs PYPLBanner chart's image
Mastercard
Price$544.93
Change-$1.54 (-0.28%)
Volume$2.19M
Capitalization489.34B
PayPal Holdings
Price$61.83
Change+$0.61 (+1.00%)
Volume$8.34M
Capitalization57.85B
MA vs PYPL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MA vs. PYPL commentary
Nov 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MA is a StrongBuy and PYPL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MA: $544.93 vs. PYPL: $61.83)
Brand notoriety: MA and PYPL are both notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MA: 81% vs. PYPL: 48%
Market capitalization -- MA: $489.34B vs. PYPL: $57.85B
MA [@Savings Banks] is valued at $489.34B. PYPL’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $57.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $644.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePYPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the long-term than PYPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PYPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PYPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the short-term than PYPL.

Price Growth

MA (@Savings Banks) experienced а +2.75% price change this week, while PYPL (@Savings Banks) price change was +2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

MA is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

PYPL is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+2.78% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MA($489B) has a higher market cap than PYPL($57.9B). MA has higher P/E ratio than PYPL: MA (34.84) vs PYPL (12.42). MA YTD gains are higher at: 4.081 vs. PYPL (-27.390). MA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.4B vs. PYPL (7.48B). PYPL has less debt than MA: PYPL (11.3B) vs MA (19B). PYPL (32.9B) and MA (31.5B) have equivalent revenues.
MAPYPLMA / PYPL
Capitalization489B57.9B845%
EBITDA19.4B7.48B259%
Gain YTD4.081-27.390-15%
P/E Ratio34.8412.42281%
Revenue31.5B32.9B96%
Total Cash10.6BN/A-
Total Debt19B11.3B168%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MA vs PYPL: Fundamental Ratings
MA
PYPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5760
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
1138
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5788
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PYPL's Valuation (76) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MA (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYPL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MA’s stock grew significantly faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

MA's SMR Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (38) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (64) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

MA's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (88) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAPYPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PYPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIAX17.290.30
+1.77%
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
EMM32.840.53
+1.64%
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
HEGD25.410.12
+0.47%
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
UDN18.510.07
+0.38%
Invesco DB US Dollar Bearish
MCHI61.91-0.29
-0.47%
iShares MSCI China ETF