MA
Price
$571.36
Change
-$0.67 (-0.12%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Capitalization
516.52B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PYPL
Price
$68.07
Change
-$1.98 (-2.83%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Capitalization
65.03B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MA vs PYPL

Header iconMA vs PYPL Comparison
Open Charts MA vs PYPLBanner chart's image
Mastercard
Price$571.36
Change-$0.67 (-0.12%)
Volume$1.82M
Capitalization516.52B
PayPal Holdings
Price$68.07
Change-$1.98 (-2.83%)
Volume$8.17M
Capitalization65.03B
MA vs PYPL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MA vs. PYPL commentary
Oct 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MA is a Buy and PYPL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MA: $571.36 vs. PYPL: $68.07)
Brand notoriety: MA and PYPL are both notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MA: 71% vs. PYPL: 64%
Market capitalization -- MA: $516.52B vs. PYPL: $65.03B
MA [@Savings Banks] is valued at $516.52B. PYPL’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $65.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $670.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePYPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the long-term than PYPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PYPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PYPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the short-term than PYPL.

Price Growth

MA (@Savings Banks) experienced а +1.52% price change this week, while PYPL (@Savings Banks) price change was +0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

MA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

PYPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.46% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MA($517B) has a higher market cap than PYPL($65B). MA has higher P/E ratio than PYPL: MA (38.53) vs PYPL (14.58). MA YTD gains are higher at: 9.129 vs. PYPL (-20.246). MA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.2B vs. PYPL (7.26B). PYPL has less debt than MA: PYPL (11.3B) vs MA (19B). PYPL has higher revenues than MA: PYPL (32.3B) vs MA (30.2B).
MAPYPLMA / PYPL
Capitalization517B65B795%
EBITDA18.2B7.26B251%
Gain YTD9.129-20.246-45%
P/E Ratio38.5314.58264%
Revenue30.2B32.3B93%
Total CashN/A10B-
Total Debt19B11.3B168%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MA vs PYPL: Fundamental Ratings
MA
PYPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7917
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18100
SMR RATING
1..100
1141
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4979
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PYPL's Valuation (83) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MA (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PYPL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MA’s stock grew significantly faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

MA's SMR Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (41) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (58) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

MA's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (79) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAPYPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERX54.141.39
+2.64%
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X ETF
KXI66.040.29
+0.44%
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
LKOR44.210.10
+0.23%
FlexShares Crdt-Scrd US Lng Corp Bd ETF
LFAR148.67N/A
N/A
Stone Ridge 2057 Longevity Income ETF
QQQM249.26-2.43
-0.97%
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

PYPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYPL has been loosely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PYPL jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYPL
1D Price
Change %
PYPL100%
-2.83%
SYF - PYPL
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
AXP - PYPL
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
AL - PYPL
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
BFH - PYPL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
COF - PYPL
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
More