MAANF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.33B
RS
Price
$306.14
Change
+$4.81 (+1.60%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
16.1B
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAANF vs RS

Header iconMAANF vs RS Comparison
Open Charts MAANF vs RSBanner chart's image
Maanshan Iron & Steel
Price$0.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization3.33B
Reliance
Price$306.14
Change+$4.81 (+1.60%)
Volume$761.04K
Capitalization16.1B
MAANF vs RS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAANF vs. RS commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAANF is a Hold and RS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MAANF: $0.22 vs. RS: $306.14)
Brand notoriety: MAANF and RS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAANF: 100% vs. RS: 193%
Market capitalization -- MAANF: $3.33B vs. RS: $16.1B
MAANF [@Steel] is valued at $3.33B. RS’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $16.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $33.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAANF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MAANF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RS is a better buy in the long-term than MAANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAANF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAANF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAANF is a better buy in the short-term than RS.

Price Growth

MAANF (@Steel) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RS (@Steel) price change was -8.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

RS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+1.65% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RS($16.1B) has a higher market cap than MAANF($3.33B). MAANF YTD gains are higher at: 26.820 vs. RS (14.639). RS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.43B vs. MAANF (-4.05B). MAANF has more cash in the bank: 6.94B vs. RS (278M). RS has less debt than MAANF: RS (1.76B) vs MAANF (23.2B). MAANF has higher revenues than RS: MAANF (80.9B) vs RS (13.7B).
MAANFRSMAANF / RS
Capitalization3.33B16.1B21%
EBITDA-4.05B1.43B-284%
Gain YTD26.82014.639183%
P/E RatioN/A22.17-
Revenue80.9B13.7B591%
Total Cash6.94B278M2,495%
Total Debt23.2B1.76B1,318%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAANF vs RS: Fundamental Ratings
MAANF
RS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3924
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
9367
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9818
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAANF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as RS (15) in the Steel industry. This means that MAANF’s stock grew similarly to RS’s over the last 12 months.

RS's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAANF (100) in the null industry. This means that RS’s stock grew significantly faster than MAANF’s over the last 12 months.

RS's SMR Rating (67) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MAANF (93) in the null industry. This means that RS’s stock grew similarly to MAANF’s over the last 12 months.

MAANF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as RS (56) in the Steel industry. This means that MAANF’s stock grew similarly to RS’s over the last 12 months.

RS's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAANF (98) in the null industry. This means that RS’s stock grew significantly faster than MAANF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAANFRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMAGX15.98N/A
N/A
Fidelity Magellan
COIIX18.80N/A
N/A
Calvert International Opportunities I
NMMGX10.70N/A
N/A
Northern Multi-Manager Glbl Real Estate
UMBMX25.23N/A
N/A
Carillon Scout Mid Cap I
STDFX46.20N/A
N/A
Allspring Large Cap Growth Admin

MAANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAANF and ZKIN have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAANF and ZKIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAANF
1D Price
Change %
MAANF100%
N/A
ZKIN - MAANF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STLD - MAANF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
NUE - MAANF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
RS - MAANF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
MTGRY - MAANF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More