Ad is loading...
MACHX vs RLBAX
MACHX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MACHX vs RLBAX
MoA Balanced Fund
Price$20.44
Change+$0.09 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.11M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.04
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.54B
MACHX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MACHX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MACHX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. MACHX (194M). MACHX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MACHX (2.03) vs RLBAX (1.27). MACHX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MACHX (40 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than MACHX (0.54). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MACHX (50.33). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACHX: RLBAX (250) vs MACHX (3000). MACHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.43 vs. RLBAX (3.49). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.32 vs. MACHX (41.35).
| MACHX | RLBAX | MACHX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.33 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.33 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.591 | 0.213 | 277% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 194M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.27 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.43 | 3.49 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.87 | 10.40 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.35 | 45.32 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.40 | 46.20 | 55% |