Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MADCX vs RNWHX
MADCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MADCX vs RNWHX
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Instl
Price$26.77
Change+$0.36 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.78
Change+$0.74 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.98B
MADCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MADCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MADCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. MADCX (2.15B). MADCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MADCX (1.66) vs RNWHX (1.00). MADCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MADCX (36 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MADCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MADCX: RNWHX (250) vs MADCX (2000000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.70 vs. MADCX (14.67). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 26.09 vs. MADCX (9.05).
| MADCX | RNWHX | MADCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.72 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.015 | 16.785 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 70B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.00 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 18.70 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.24 | 33.47 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.05 | 26.09 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers