MAGE
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.72M
MAKOF
Price
$4.39
Change
-$0.02 (-0.45%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
361.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAGE vs MAKOF

Header iconMAGE vs MAKOF Comparison
Open Charts MAGE vs MAKOFBanner chart's image
Magellan Copper and Gold
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.72M
Mako Mining
Price$4.39
Change-$0.02 (-0.45%)
Volume$25.66K
Capitalization361.5M
MAGE vs MAKOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MAGE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAGE vs. MAKOF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAGE is a StrongBuy and MAKOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MAGE: $0.10 vs. MAKOF: $4.39)
Brand notoriety: MAGE and MAKOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAGE: 2% vs. MAKOF: 107%
Market capitalization -- MAGE: $2.72M vs. MAKOF: $347.39M
MAGE [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.72M. MAKOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $347.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAGE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAKOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MAGE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAKOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAKOF is a better buy in the long-term than MAGE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAGE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAKOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAGE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MAKOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAGE is a better buy in the short-term than MAKOF.

Price Growth

MAGE (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.74% price change this week, while MAKOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3358.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.22% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAKOF($361M) has a higher market cap than MAGE($2.72M). MAKOF YTD gains are higher at: 99.093 vs. MAGE (17.059). MAKOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 44M vs. MAGE (-738.1K). MAKOF has more cash in the bank: 10.6M vs. MAGE (5.8K). MAGE has less debt than MAKOF: MAGE (859K) vs MAKOF (5.62M). MAKOF has higher revenues than MAGE: MAKOF (105M) vs MAGE (0).
MAGEMAKOFMAGE / MAKOF
Capitalization2.72M361M1%
EBITDA-738.1K44M-2%
Gain YTD17.05999.09317%
P/E RatioN/A16.17-
Revenue0105M-
Total Cash5.8K10.6M0%
Total Debt859K5.62M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAGE vs MAKOF: Fundamental Ratings
MAGE
MAKOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10085
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAKOF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (95). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAGE (92). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

MAKOF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MAGE (100). This means that MAKOF’s stock grew similarly to MAGE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAGEMAKOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAGE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGRCX11.06N/A
N/A
AB Growth C
LAFRX20.40N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
IRCIX12.63N/A
N/A
Voya Russell Small Cap Index Port S2
FESIX5.29N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Real Estate Index
BIDEX11.14N/A
N/A
BlackRock Defensive Advantage EM Instl

MAGE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAGE and MAIFF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAGE and MAIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAGE
1D Price
Change %
MAGE100%
+10.56%
MAIFF - MAGE
9%
Poorly correlated
+5.12%
LONCF - MAGE
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
LOMLF - MAGE
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
MAKOF - MAGE
-7%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%

MAKOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAKOF and PAAS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAKOF and PAAS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAKOF
1D Price
Change %
MAKOF100%
-0.45%
PAAS - MAKOF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
EQX - MAKOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
AU - MAKOF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
EGO - MAKOF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
CGLCF - MAKOF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
More