Advertisement
MAHMF vs POAHY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAHMF is a Buy and POAHY is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAHMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOAHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MAHMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- POAHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAHMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POAHY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAHMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- POAHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MAHMF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while POAHY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +3.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +2.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.64%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (+2.48% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| MAHMF | POAHY | MAHMF / POAHY | |
| Capitalization | 44.8B | 13.1B | 342% |
| EBITDA | 351B | -21.93B | -1,601% |
| Gain YTD | -2.211 | 21.315 | -10% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.77 | 3.00 | 860% |
| Revenue | 1.64T | -22.02B | -7,452% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.29B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
MAHMF | POAHY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
POAHY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MAHMF (40). This means that POAHY’s stock grew similarly to MAHMF’s over the last 12 months.
MAHMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for POAHY (100). This means that MAHMF’s stock grew significantly faster than POAHY’s over the last 12 months.
MAHMF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POAHY (97). This means that MAHMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POAHY’s over the last 12 months.
MAHMF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as POAHY (49). This means that MAHMF’s stock grew similarly to POAHY’s over the last 12 months.
MAHMF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as POAHY (53). This means that MAHMF’s stock grew similarly to POAHY’s over the last 12 months.
| MAHMF | POAHY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSJW | 25.67 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Invesco BulltShr 2032 Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF | |||
| GK | 25.33 | N/A | N/A |
| AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | |||
| AFIF | 9.36 | N/A | -0.01% |
| Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | |||
| FELC | 35.85 | -0.10 | -0.28% |
| Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | |||
| CFA | 89.32 | -0.37 | -0.41% |
| VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF | |||
MAHMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAHMF and F have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAHMF and F's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAHMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAHMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| F - MAHMF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MZDAF - MAHMF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| POAHY - MAHMF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| MMTOF - MAHMF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NFYEF - MAHMF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.12% | ||
More | ||||
POAHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POAHY has been closely correlated with VWAPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if POAHY jumps, then VWAPY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POAHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POAHY | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| VWAPY - POAHY | 76% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| VWAGY - POAHY | 74% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| MBGAF - POAHY | 69% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| MBGYY - POAHY | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| DRPRY - POAHY | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||