MAIN
Price
$55.68
Change
-$1.97 (-3.42%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.02B
51 days until earnings call
SAR
Price
$23.51
Change
-$0.50 (-2.08%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
316.76M
57 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MAIN vs SAR

Header iconMAIN vs SAR Comparison
Open Charts MAIN vs SARBanner chart's image
Main Street Capital
Price$55.68
Change-$1.97 (-3.42%)
Volume$5.23K
Capitalization4.02B
SARATOGA INVESTMENT
Price$23.51
Change-$0.50 (-2.08%)
Volume$200
Capitalization316.76M
MAIN vs SAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAIN vs. SAR commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAIN is a Hold and SAR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (MAIN: $57.65 vs. SAR: $24.01)
Brand notoriety: MAIN and SAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAIN: 118% vs. SAR: 158%
Market capitalization -- MAIN: $4.02B vs. SAR: $316.76M
MAIN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.02B. SAR’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $316.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAIN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than SAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAR is a better buy in the short-term than MAIN.

Price Growth

MAIN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.32% price change this week, while SAR (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

SAR is expected to report earnings on Jul 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than SAR($317M). SAR has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: SAR (12.23) vs MAIN (8.97). SAR YTD gains are higher at: 3.434 vs. MAIN (-0.321). SAR has less debt than MAIN: SAR (794M) vs MAIN (1.8B). MAIN has higher revenues than SAR: MAIN (510M) vs SAR (34.6M).
MAINSARMAIN / SAR
Capitalization4.02B317M1,268%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.3213.434-9%
P/E Ratio8.9712.2373%
Revenue510M34.6M1,474%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.8B794M227%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAIN vs SAR: Fundamental Ratings
MAIN
SAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7761
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2047
SMR RATING
1..100
1335
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9494
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3379
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAR's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAIN (38). This means that SAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as SAR (47). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to SAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SAR (35). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to SAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SAR (94). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to SAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAR (79). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAINSAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDX23.090.16
+0.70%
Simplify High Yield ETF
BBAG46.000.24
+0.52%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Aggt Bond ETF
BBCB45.410.17
+0.37%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF
UCO23.64-0.84
-3.43%
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil
PTEC34.51-1.99
-5.45%
Global X PropTech ETF

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with HTGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then HTGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
-1.69%
HTGC - MAIN
70%
Closely correlated
-1.59%
CSWC - MAIN
69%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
ARCC - MAIN
67%
Closely correlated
-2.39%
FSK - MAIN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
GLAD - MAIN
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More