MAIN
Price
$61.34
Change
-$1.15 (-1.84%)
Updated
Oct 7, 02:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.59B
23 days until earnings call
TRIN
Price
$14.71
Change
-$0.34 (-2.26%)
Updated
Oct 7, 01:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.06B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAIN vs TRIN

Header iconMAIN vs TRIN Comparison
Open Charts MAIN vs TRINBanner chart's image
Main Street Capital
Price$61.34
Change-$1.15 (-1.84%)
Volume$648
Capitalization5.59B
Trinity Capital
Price$14.71
Change-$0.34 (-2.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.06B
MAIN vs TRIN Comparison Chart in %
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAIN vs. TRIN commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAIN is a Hold and TRIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MAIN: $62.49 vs. TRIN: $15.06)
Brand notoriety: MAIN and TRIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAIN: 102% vs. TRIN: 109%
Market capitalization -- MAIN: $5.59B vs. TRIN: $1.06B
MAIN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.59B. TRIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $182.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAIN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTRIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TRIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than TRIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRIN is a better buy in the short-term than MAIN.

Price Growth

MAIN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.36% price change this week, while TRIN (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

TRIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.47% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($5.59B) has a higher market cap than TRIN($1.06B). MAIN has higher P/E ratio than TRIN: MAIN (10.28) vs TRIN (6.63). TRIN YTD gains are higher at: 15.174 vs. MAIN (12.570). TRIN has less debt than MAIN: TRIN (1.05B) vs MAIN (2.22B). MAIN has higher revenues than TRIN: MAIN (623M) vs TRIN (203M).
MAINTRINMAIN / TRIN
Capitalization5.59B1.06B528%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.57015.17483%
P/E Ratio10.286.63155%
Revenue623M203M307%
Total CashN/A24.2M-
Total Debt2.22B1.05B211%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAINTRIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MPACX28.39N/A
N/A
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
DHLYX33.95N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Large Cap Y
FSTRX35.14N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value A
VCGRX24.25N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Capital Growth R6
SHDRX10.29N/A
N/A
American Beacon Shapiro SMID Cap Eq R6

TRIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRIN has been closely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRIN jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRIN
1D Price
Change %
TRIN100%
-1.21%
GSBD - TRIN
71%
Closely correlated
-0.60%
BCSF - TRIN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
CGBD - TRIN
70%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
OBDC - TRIN
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
MAIN - TRIN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
More