Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAMAX vs RLBEX
MAMAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MAMAX vs RLBEX
MFS Moderate Allocation A
Price$20.40
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$36.45
Change+$0.10 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.05B
MAMAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAMAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAMAX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 250B vs. MAMAX (6.32B). MAMAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: MAMAX (2.42) vs RLBEX (1.90). MAMAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MAMAX (23 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). MAMAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MAMAX (4.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAMAX: RLBEX (250) vs MAMAX (1000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. MAMAX (5.80). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.01 vs. MAMAX (25.71).
| MAMAX | RLBEX | MAMAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.59 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.59 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.853 | 7.007 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 250B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 1.90 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 7.61 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.47 | 34.11 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.71 | 43.01 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.38 | 66.14 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement