MAN
Price
$56.82
Change
-$0.12 (-0.21%)
Updated
Dec 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
43 days until earnings call
TCCPY
Price
$3.62
Change
-$0.06 (-1.63%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

MAN vs TCCPY

Header iconMAN vs TCCPY Comparison
Open Charts MAN vs TCCPYBanner chart's image
ManpowerGroup
Price$56.82
Change-$0.12 (-0.21%)
Volume$6.83K
CapitalizationN/A
Technopro Holdings
Price$3.62
Change-$0.06 (-1.63%)
Volume$23.73K
CapitalizationN/A
MAN vs TCCPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCCPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAN vs. TCCPY commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAN is a Hold and TCCPY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (MAN: $56.94 vs. TCCPY: $3.62)
Brand notoriety: MAN and TCCPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAN: 460% vs. TCCPY: 37%
Market capitalization -- MAN: $3.65B vs. TCCPY: $2.8B
MAN [@Personnel Services] is valued at $3.65B. TCCPY’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $2.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $10.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTCCPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MAN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TCCPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCCPY is a better buy in the long-term than MAN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCCPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TCCPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAN is a better buy in the short-term than TCCPY.

Price Growth

MAN (@Personnel Services) experienced а -6.93% price change this week, while TCCPY (@Personnel Services) price change was -1.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -4.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-4.46% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAN($3.65B) has a higher market cap than TCCPY($2.8B). MAN has higher P/E ratio than TCCPY: MAN (42.90) vs TCCPY (25.64). MAN YTD gains are higher at: -25.047 vs. TCCPY (-31.011). TCCPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.2B vs. MAN (374M). TCCPY has more cash in the bank: 36.7B vs. MAN (581M). MAN has less debt than TCCPY: MAN (1.33B) vs TCCPY (24.2B). TCCPY has higher revenues than MAN: TCCPY (195B) vs MAN (18.9B).
MANTCCPYMAN / TCCPY
Capitalization3.65B2.8B131%
EBITDA374M24.2B2%
Gain YTD-25.047-31.01181%
P/E Ratio42.9025.64167%
Revenue18.9B195B10%
Total Cash581M36.7B2%
Total Debt1.33B24.2B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAN vs TCCPY: Fundamental Ratings
MAN
TCCPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8841
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1455
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAN's Valuation (8) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as TCCPY (16) in the null industry. This means that MAN’s stock grew similarly to TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.

MAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as TCCPY (100) in the null industry. This means that MAN’s stock grew similarly to TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.

TCCPY's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAN (88) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that TCCPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAN’s over the last 12 months.

TCCPY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as MAN (79) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that TCCPY’s stock grew similarly to MAN’s over the last 12 months.

MAN's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCCPY (55) in the null industry. This means that MAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MANTCCPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCCPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLASF6.320.61
+10.71%
Glass House Brands Inc.
NVLHF0.15N/A
+1.94%
Nevada Lithium Resources Inc.
KYOCY9.810.13
+1.34%
Kyocera Corp.
DASTY34.380.03
+0.09%
Dassault Systemes SA
KKOYY9.26-0.17
-1.76%
Kesko OY

TCCPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCCPY and RANJY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCCPY and RANJY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCCPY
1D Price
Change %
TCCPY100%
-1.66%
RANJY - TCCPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
AHEXY - TCCPY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
NSP - TCCPY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
MAN - TCCPY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
RHI - TCCPY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
More