MAN vs TCCPY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAN is a Hold and TCCPY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTCCPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MAN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TCCPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCCPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TCCPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MAN (@Personnel Services) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while TCCPY (@Personnel Services) price change was +0.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Personnel Services (+0.70% weekly)Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.
| MAN | TCCPY | MAN / TCCPY | |
| Capitalization | 3.65B | 2.8B | 131% |
| EBITDA | 374M | 24.2B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -19.722 | -32.347 | 61% |
| P/E Ratio | 42.90 | 25.64 | 167% |
| Revenue | 18.9B | 195B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 581M | 36.7B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 1.33B | 24.2B | 5% |
MAN | TCCPY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 6 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MAN's Valuation (9) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as TCCPY (17) in the null industry. This means that MAN’s stock grew similarly to TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.
MAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as TCCPY (100) in the null industry. This means that MAN’s stock grew similarly to TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.
TCCPY's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAN (88) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that TCCPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAN’s over the last 12 months.
TCCPY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MAN (76) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that TCCPY’s stock grew similarly to MAN’s over the last 12 months.
MAN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCCPY (69) in the null industry. This means that MAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCCPY’s over the last 12 months.
| MAN | TCCPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | 9 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 79% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LFSFX | 34.13 | 0.63 | +1.88% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F | |||
| HRSMX | 83.27 | 1.07 | +1.30% |
| Hood River Small-Cap Growth Instl | |||
| RWMBX | 63.93 | 0.39 | +0.61% |
| American Funds Washington Mutual R2 | |||
| FGFRX | 36.43 | 0.10 | +0.28% |
| Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R | |||
| GABPX | 52.94 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Equity Income P | |||
MAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAN has been loosely correlated with RHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAN jumps, then RHI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAN | 100% | +2.76% | ||
| RHI - MAN | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| KFY - MAN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| RANJY - MAN | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| KELYA - MAN | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.45% | ||
| HSII - MAN | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||
TCCPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TCCPY and RANJY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCCPY and RANJY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCCPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCCPY | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| RANJY - TCCPY | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| AHEXY - TCCPY | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
| NSP - TCCPY | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.05% | ||
| MAN - TCCPY | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.76% | ||
| RHI - TCCPY | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
More | ||||