MANH
Price
$304.54
Change
+$1.18 (+0.39%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
4 days until earnings call
TMICF
Price
$59.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Ad is loading...

MANH vs TMICF

Header iconMANH vs TMICF Comparison
Open Charts MANH vs TMICFBanner chart's image
Manhattan Associates
Price$304.54
Change+$1.18 (+0.39%)
Volume$343.69K
CapitalizationN/A
Trend Micro
Price$59.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MANH vs TMICF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MANH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
MANH vs. TMICF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MANH is a StrongBuy and TMICF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MANH: $304.54 vs. TMICF: $59.08)
Brand notoriety: MANH and TMICF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MANH: 96% vs. TMICF: 56%
Market capitalization -- MANH: $15.41B vs. TMICF: $6.47B
MANH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $15.41B. TMICF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MANH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMICF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MANH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMICF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MANH is a better buy in the long-term than TMICF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MANH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MANH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MANH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.59% price change this week, while TMICF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

MANH is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MANH($15.4B) has a higher market cap than TMICF($6.47B). MANH has higher P/E ratio than TMICF: MANH (87.79) vs TMICF (34.48). TMICF YTD gains are higher at: 49.334 vs. MANH (41.436). TMICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 65.3B vs. MANH (216M). TMICF has more cash in the bank: 231B vs. MANH (271M). TMICF has higher revenues than MANH: TMICF (232B) vs MANH (929M).
MANHTMICFMANH / TMICF
Capitalization15.4B6.47B238%
EBITDA216M65.3B0%
Gain YTD41.43649.33484%
P/E Ratio87.7934.48255%
Revenue929M232B0%
Total Cash271M231B0%
Total Debt17.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MANH vs TMICF: Fundamental Ratings
MANH
TMICF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2347
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
753
SMR RATING
1..100
1366
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7091
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMICF's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as MANH (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TMICF’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMICF (53) in the null industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMICF’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's SMR Rating (13) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMICF (66) in the null industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMICF’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TMICF (39) in the null industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to TMICF’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TMICF (91) in the null industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to TMICF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MANH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MANH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

MANH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MANH has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MANH jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MANH
1D Price
Change %
MANH100%
+0.39%
COIN - MANH
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
CLSK - MANH
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
RIOT - MANH
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
CDNS - MANH
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
SNPS - MANH
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More

TMICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMICF and IFBD have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMICF and IFBD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMICF
1D Price
Change %
TMICF100%
N/A
IFBD - TMICF
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.57%
MANH - TMICF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
DCBO - TMICF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
URLOF - TMICF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
TMICY - TMICF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More