Advertisement
MANZF vs SUMCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MANZF is a Hold and SUMCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MANZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSUMCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MANZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SUMCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MANZF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MANZF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SUMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MANZF (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUMCF (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -1.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -4.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.47%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-4.92% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| MANZF | SUMCF | MANZF / SUMCF | |
| Capitalization | 1.16M | 2.61B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -19.35M | 111B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -91.983 | -1.009 | 9,113% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 40.16 | - |
| Revenue | 188M | 404B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 14.2M | 80.9B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 9.02M | 365B | 0% |
MANZF | SUMCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SUMCF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MANZF (82). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MANZF’s over the last 12 months.
SUMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MANZF (100). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew similarly to MANZF’s over the last 12 months.
MANZF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMCF (98). This means that MANZF’s stock grew similarly to SUMCF’s over the last 12 months.
SUMCF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MANZF (98). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MANZF’s over the last 12 months.
MANZF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMCF (8). This means that MANZF’s stock grew similarly to SUMCF’s over the last 12 months.
| MANZF | SUMCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 3% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
MANZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MANZF and MOBX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MANZF and MOBX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MANZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MOBX - MANZF | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.84% | ||
| VLN - MANZF | 7% Poorly correlated | -4.61% | ||
| SKYT - MANZF | 1% Poorly correlated | -5.03% | ||
| DINRF - MANZF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SUMCF - MANZF | -0% Poorly correlated | -4.97% | ||
More | ||||
SUMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUMCF has been loosely correlated with SUOPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SUMCF jumps, then SUOPY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUMCF | 100% | -4.97% | ||
| SUOPY - SUMCF | 47% Loosely correlated | -6.42% | ||
| INTT - SUMCF | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.76% | ||
| STMEF - SUMCF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASMLF - SUMCF | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.25% | ||
| RNWEF - SUMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||