Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAPCX vs RNWBX
MAPCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MAPCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Sustainable Em Mkts Eq Ins
Price$15.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.62M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.71
Change+$0.16 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.94B
MAPCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAPCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69.9B vs. MAPCX (78.6M). MAPCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MAPCX (2.33) vs RNWBX (0.13). MAPCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MAPCX (49 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MAPCX (1.23). MAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPCX: RNWBX (250) vs MAPCX (2000000). MAPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.18 vs. RNWBX (8.08). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.98 vs. MAPCX (0.24).
| MAPCX | RNWBX | MAPCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.67 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.67 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.345 | 15.173 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.6M | 69.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 0.13 | 1,820% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.18 | 8.08 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.25 | 37.85 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.24 | 24.98 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.05 | 59.66 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement