Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MAPCX vs RNWBX
MAPCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MAPCX vs RNWBX
BlackRock Sustainable Em Mkts Eq Ins
Price$14.61
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.5M
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.58
Change+$0.31 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.26B
MAPCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MAPCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.3B vs. MAPCX (76.5M). MAPCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MAPCX (2.50) vs RNWBX (0.13). MAPCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MAPCX (49 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MAPCX (1.23). MAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPCX: RNWBX (250) vs MAPCX (2000000). MAPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.52 vs. RNWBX (6.13). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.76 vs. MAPCX (0.87).
| MAPCX | RNWBX | MAPCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.67 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.67 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.259 | 10.496 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.5M | 67.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 0.13 | 1,856% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.52 | 6.13 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.88 | 27.90 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.87 | 24.76 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.44 | 51.53 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement