Ad is loading...
MAPPF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
OWLT
Price
$4.67
Change
-$0.12 (-2.51%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

MAPPF vs OWLT

Header iconMAPPF vs OWLT Comparison
Open Charts MAPPF vs OWLTBanner chart's image
PROSTAR
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.42K
CapitalizationN/A
Owlet
Price$4.67
Change-$0.12 (-2.51%)
Volume$66.1K
CapitalizationN/A
MAPPF vs OWLT Comparison Chart
Loading...
OWLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAPPF vs. OWLT commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAPPF is a Hold and OWLT is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MAPPF: $0.10 vs. OWLT: $4.67)
Brand notoriety: MAPPF and OWLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAPPF: 29% vs. OWLT: 157%
Market capitalization -- MAPPF: $30.1M vs. OWLT: $38.64M
MAPPF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $30.1M. OWLT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $38.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAPPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOWLT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MAPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OWLT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OWLT is a better buy in the long-term than MAPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWLT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OWLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

MAPPF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while OWLT (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWLT is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWLT($38.6M) has a higher market cap than MAPPF($30.1M). OWLT YTD gains are higher at: -11.553 vs. MAPPF (-38.557). MAPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.77M vs. OWLT (-27.49M). OWLT has more cash in the bank: 16.6M vs. MAPPF (1.17M). MAPPF has less debt than OWLT: MAPPF (192K) vs OWLT (15.2M). OWLT has higher revenues than MAPPF: OWLT (54M) vs MAPPF (799K).
MAPPFOWLTMAPPF / OWLT
Capitalization30.1M38.6M78%
EBITDA-4.77M-27.49M17%
Gain YTD-38.557-11.553334%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue799K54M1%
Total Cash1.17M16.6M7%
Total Debt192K15.2M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAPPF: Fundamental Ratings
MAPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OWLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFV53.960.23
+0.42%
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
SPLB22.78-0.02
-0.09%
SPDR® Portfolio Long Term Corp Bd ETF
RZV113.36-0.55
-0.49%
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
AMAX7.89-0.04
-0.53%
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
EVX183.52-1.12
-0.61%
VanEck Environmental Svcs ETF

MAPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAPPF and QXO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAPPF and QXO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAPPF
1D Price
Change %
MAPPF100%
N/A
QXO - MAPPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
GUNGF - MAPPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LIDR - MAPPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.54%
OWLT - MAPPF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
BMBL - MAPPF
7%
Poorly correlated
-4.37%
More

OWLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OWLT and SQ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OWLT and SQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWLT
1D Price
Change %
OWLT100%
-2.51%
SQ - OWLT
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
INGN - OWLT
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
IRTC - OWLT
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.58%
TCMD - OWLT
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
MHUA - OWLT
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.39%
More