It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAPPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAPPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWLT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MAPPF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.72% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
MAPPF | OWLT | MAPPF / OWLT | |
Capitalization | 30.1M | 38.6M | 78% |
EBITDA | -4.77M | -27.49M | 17% |
Gain YTD | -64.124 | -15.530 | 413% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 799K | 54M | 1% |
Total Cash | 1.17M | 16.6M | 7% |
Total Debt | 192K | 15.2M | 1% |
MAPPF | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MAPPF | OWLT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago83% | 3 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago78% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GAPR | 37.57 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buf ETF - Apr | |||
VIGI | 82.71 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
Vanguard Intl Div Apprec ETF | |||
DIEM | 27.29 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
Franklin Emerging Mkt Core Div TltIdxETF | |||
IQDY | 29.23 | -0.14 | -0.49% |
FlexShares Intl Qual Div Dynamic ETF | |||
LGLV | 169.30 | -0.99 | -0.58% |
SPDR® SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatil ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAPPF and QXO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAPPF and QXO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAPPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MAPPF | 100% | -15.13% | ||
QXO - MAPPF | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.01% | ||
GUNGF - MAPPF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LIDR - MAPPF | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.17% | ||
OWLT - MAPPF | 7% Poorly correlated | -4.09% | ||
BMBL - MAPPF | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that OWLT and SQ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OWLT and SQ's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OWLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OWLT | 100% | -4.90% | ||
SQ - OWLT | 28% Poorly correlated | -7.67% | ||
INGN - OWLT | 27% Poorly correlated | -6.80% | ||
SSNC - OWLT | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.13% | ||
IRTC - OWLT | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.01% | ||
TCMD - OWLT | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.48% | ||
More |