Advertisement
MATV vs TMHC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MATV is a StrongBuy and TMHC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MATV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MATV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TMHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MATV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MATV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TMHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MATV (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +12.67% price change this week, while TMHC (@Homebuilding) price change was +2.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.64%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
MATV is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
TMHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.51% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Homebuilding (+1.77% weekly)Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| MATV | TMHC | MATV / TMHC | |
| Capitalization | 1.01B | 6.51B | 15% |
| EBITDA | -270.9M | 1.12B | -24% |
| Gain YTD | -38.326 | -5.097 | 752% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.97 | 8.77 | 205% |
| Revenue | 2.03B | 7.42B | 27% |
| Total Cash | 120M | 799M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 1.17B | 2.1B | 56% |
MATV | TMHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MATV's Valuation (15) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMHC (65) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that MATV’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMHC’s over the last 12 months.
TMHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Homebuilding industry is significantly better than the same rating for MATV (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew significantly faster than MATV’s over the last 12 months.
TMHC's SMR Rating (52) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MATV (95) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MATV’s over the last 12 months.
TMHC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MATV (61) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that TMHC’s stock grew similarly to MATV’s over the last 12 months.
MATV's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as TMHC (72) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that MATV’s stock grew similarly to TMHC’s over the last 12 months.
| MATV | TMHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| USCI | 71.79 | 0.91 | +1.28% |
| United States Commodity Index | |||
| JMST | 50.77 | N/A | +0.01% |
| JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Inc ETF | |||
| WBND | 19.85 | N/A | N/A |
| Western Asset Total Return ETF | |||
| UJUN | 34.92 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun | |||
| TBLD | 18.68 | -0.15 | -0.80% |
| Thornburg Income Builder Opportunities Trust | |||
MATV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MATV has been loosely correlated with KOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MATV jumps, then KOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MATV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATV | 100% | N/A | ||
| KOP - MATV | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| KWR - MATV | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| EMN - MATV | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.08% | ||
| SCL - MATV | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| AVNT - MATV | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||
TMHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMHC has been closely correlated with MTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMHC jumps, then MTH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMHC | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| MTH - TMHC | 90% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| PHM - TMHC | 89% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| KBH - TMHC | 89% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| MHO - TMHC | 88% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| CCS - TMHC | 87% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||