Two of the largest publicly traded homebuilders in the United States — MTH (Meritage Homes Corporation) and TMHC (Taylor Morrison Home Corporation) — have offered investors a fascinating side-by-side case study in the homebuilding sector throughout 2026. Both companies operate in the same macro environment of elevated mortgage rates, constrained housing affordability, and cautious consumer sentiment. Yet their stock stories could hardly be more different: one is being acquired in a landmark deal by Berkshire Hathaway, while the other continues to chart its own course as an independent public company. This comparison examines how each company has positioned itself, what has driven their recent performance, and how traders and investors might evaluate them in the context of current market conditions.
MTH (Meritage Homes Corporation), founded in 1985 and headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, is the fifth-largest public homebuilder in the United States. The company specializes in designing and constructing single-family homes with a strategic emphasis on entry-level and first-time buyers. Through its GreenSmart program, Meritage integrates energy-efficient features aimed at reducing long-term ownership costs — a selling point that resonates with its affordability-conscious customer base. The company operates across Arizona, California, Colorado, Texas, Florida, Georgia, and the Carolinas.
In recent quarters, Meritage has faced measurable earnings pressure. Full-year 2025 diluted earnings per share (EPS) — or earnings per share — fell 41% year-over-year to $6.35, while home closing revenue declined 9% to $5.76 billion. The company's home closing gross margin contracted from 24.9% in 2024 to 19.7% in 2025, driven by greater use of sales incentives, higher lot costs, and non-recurring charges tied to land deal walk-aways and inventory impairments. The first quarter of 2026 continued the trend, with MTH reporting EPS of $0.86 — missing consensus estimates — on revenue of $1.12 billion, down 17.5% year-over-year. Home closing gross margin slipped further to approximately 17.5%.
Despite these headwinds, management has taken decisive actions. The company announced a $400 million share repurchase program for 2026, maintained a strong balance sheet with a net debt-to-capital ratio of roughly 17%, and expanded its community count by 15% year-over-year to position for a demand recovery. The stock has traded in a range of roughly $58 to $85 over the past year, with a consensus analyst rating of Hold and an average price target near $80. Goldman Sachs recently raised its target to $93 while maintaining a Buy rating, reflecting a view that the worst of the margin compression may be priced in.
TMHC (Taylor Morrison Home Corporation), also based in Scottsdale, Arizona, is a leading national homebuilder and land developer with a heritage tracing back to 1921. The company operates under the Taylor Morrison and Esplanade brands, serving a broad consumer spectrum that spans entry-level, first-time, move-up, luxury, and active-adult buyers. Its markets include Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Texas, and more recently South Carolina. Taylor Morrison's diversified portfolio and vertically integrated model — managing land acquisition, development, construction, and sales — have historically supported more resilient margins than some of its entry-level-focused peers.
Full-year 2025 results highlighted this relative strength: adjusted home closings gross margin reached 23.0%, and the company delivered nearly 13,000 homes at an average sales price of approximately $597,000. Return on equity (ROE) — a measure of profitability relative to shareholder capital — was 13%, and book value per share grew 14% year-over-year. Diluted EPS came in at $7.77, down a modest 6% from 2024. In the first quarter of 2026, TMHC posted EPS of $1.12, beating consensus estimates, on revenue of $1.39 billion.
The defining event for TMHC in recent months, however, has been the announcement that Berkshire Hathaway agreed to acquire the company for $72.50 per share in cash — a deal valuing the equity at approximately $6.8 billion and the enterprise at roughly $8.5 billion. Taylor Morrison shareholders approved the merger at a special meeting in late July 2026. Upon closing, expected in the second half of 2026, TMHC will become a wholly owned, privately held subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, and its common stock will be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange. The acquisition price represented a premium of more than 20% to the pre-announcement trading level, and the stock has since traded tightly around $72.50 as a merger-arbitrage instrument.
In a market environment as nuanced as the current homebuilding landscape, many traders and investors turn to quantitative tools to identify opportunities. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of AI-powered trading bots from among hundreds available on the platform. These automated systems trade thousands of different tickers across multiple asset classes, but only the strongest performers and those best suited to prevailing market conditions earn a place in this curated section. Each bot operates with its own trading style, strategy, and timeframe — ranging from short-term swing trading to longer-duration trend following — and comes with transparent performance statistics, including win rates, trade frequency, and historical return profiles. For investors seeking a data-driven edge in comparing stocks like MTH and TMHC, exploring the Trending AI Robots page may offer valuable quantitative perspective.
The contrast between MTH and TMHC extends across multiple dimensions. Starting with business model and consumer focus: Meritage has concentrated on entry-level and first-time buyers at average selling prices of roughly $375,000 to $384,000 — a segment highly sensitive to mortgage rate movements and economic uncertainty. Taylor Morrison, by comparison, spans a wider consumer spectrum with average selling prices around $597,000, giving it exposure to more financially resilient move-up and active-adult buyers alongside entry-level customers.
On margin resilience, TMHC has demonstrated a clear advantage. Its adjusted home closings gross margin of 23.0% in 2025 meaningfully exceeded Meritage's 19.7% (or 20.8% on an adjusted basis). Taylor Morrison's SG&A ratio — selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of home closing revenue — also improved to 9.5% in 2025, while Meritage's rose to 10.7%.
In terms of market capitalization and valuation, TMHC had a larger market cap of approximately $6.7 billion before the acquisition, compared to Meritage's roughly $4.9 billion. On a price-to-earnings (P/E) basis, TMHC traded at approximately 10.7x trailing earnings versus MTH at roughly 13-14x, reflecting differing growth expectations and risk perceptions.
The most critical divergence, however, is corporate trajectory. TMHC is transitioning toward life as a private Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary — a development that effectively caps its public-market upside near the $72.50 deal price but provides downside protection and cash certainty for current shareholders. MTH, meanwhile, remains a fully independent public company whose stock will continue to reflect housing-cycle dynamics, interest-rate expectations, and execution on its turnaround strategy, including the $400 million buyback program and community-count expansion.
From a probabilistic, trend-oriented perspective, Tickeron's AI-driven framework would likely view MTH and TMHC as serving fundamentally different roles in a portfolio. TMHC currently functions as a low-volatility merger-arbitrage situation with limited remaining upside and a defined timeline for delisting — characteristics that suit risk-averse, event-driven strategies rather than trend-following approaches. MTH, by contrast, presents a more dynamic opportunity set: trend-following AI models could find appeal in the stock's potential mean-reversion characteristics if housing demand recovers, especially given the aggressive buyback, expanding community footprint, and a valuation that some analysts view as pricing in significant pessimism. The AI would likely favor MTH for momentum and turnaround-oriented strategies, while acknowledging that TMHC offers greater near-term stability — albeit one tied almost entirely to deal-completion probability rather than operating fundamentals.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MTH (@Homebuilding) experienced а -2.74% price change this week, while TMHC (@Homebuilding) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.20%.
MTH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
TMHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| MTH | TMHC | MTH / TMHC | |
| Capitalization | 4.8B | 6.67B | 72% |
| EBITDA | 451M | 1.03B | 44% |
| Gain YTD | 12.350 | 23.068 | 54% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.34 | 10.80 | 142% |
| Revenue | 5.4B | 7.61B | 71% |
| Total Cash | 807M | 653M | 124% |
| Total Debt | 1.91B | 2.42B | 79% |
MTH | TMHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTH's Valuation (6) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMHC (42). This means that MTH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMHC’s over the last 12 months.
TMHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTH (61). This means that TMHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTH’s over the last 12 months.
TMHC's SMR Rating (69) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MTH (83). This means that TMHC’s stock grew similarly to MTH’s over the last 12 months.
TMHC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as MTH (51). This means that TMHC’s stock grew similarly to MTH’s over the last 12 months.
MTH's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as TMHC (17). This means that MTH’s stock grew similarly to TMHC’s over the last 12 months.
| MTH | TMHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 69% | 24 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 70% | 22 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTH has been closely correlated with KBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTH jumps, then KBH could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMHC has been closely correlated with MHO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMHC jumps, then MHO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMHC | 100% | N/A | ||
| MHO - TMHC | 74% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| MTH - TMHC | 74% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| KBH - TMHC | 68% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| HOV - TMHC | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| BZH - TMHC | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
More | ||||