Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MBAPX vs RLBAX
MBAPX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MBAPX vs RLBAX
Praxis Genesis Balanced A
Price$17.27
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.82M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.73
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
MBAPX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MBAPX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBAPX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. MBAPX (104M). MBAPX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MBAPX (1.85) vs RLBAX (1.10). MBAPX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MBAPX (16 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than MBAPX (0.91). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MBAPX (13.43). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBAPX: RLBAX (250) vs MBAPX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.08 vs. MBAPX (7.95). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. MBAPX (26.29).
| MBAPX | RLBAX | MBAPX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.31 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.723 | 14.271 | 82% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 1.10 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.95 | 9.08 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.76 | 48.64 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.29 | 38.13 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.96 | 69.46 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement