MBC
Price
$10.52
Change
-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.38B
60 days until earnings call
NCL
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.04 (-14.81%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
13.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBC vs NCL

Header iconMBC vs NCL Comparison
Open Charts MBC vs NCLBanner chart's image
MasterBrand
Price$10.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Volume$598.49K
Capitalization2.38B
Northann
Price$0.23
Change-$0.04 (-14.81%)
Volume$9.36M
Capitalization13.31M
MBC vs NCL Comparison Chart
Loading...
MBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBC vs. NCL commentary
Jun 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBC is a Hold and NCL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 13, 2025
Stock price -- (MBC: $10.52 vs. NCL: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: MBC and NCL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBC: 60% vs. NCL: 79%
Market capitalization -- MBC: $2.38B vs. NCL: $13.31M
MBC [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $2.38B. NCL’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $13.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $30.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $2.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNCL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MBC and NCL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NCL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBC is a better buy in the short-term than NCL.

Price Growth

MBC (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while NCL (@Home Furnishings) price change was -82.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBC is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (-1.77% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBC($2.38B) has a higher market cap than NCL($13.3M). NCL has higher P/E ratio than MBC: NCL (263.16) vs MBC (13.13). NCL YTD gains are higher at: -15.187 vs. MBC (-27.995). MBC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 368M vs. NCL (-549.79K). MBC has more cash in the bank: 149M vs. NCL (90.5K). NCL has less debt than MBC: NCL (6.91M) vs MBC (770M). MBC has higher revenues than NCL: MBC (2.73B) vs NCL (10.6M).
MBCNCLMBC / NCL
Capitalization2.38B13.3M17,895%
EBITDA368M-549.79K-66,935%
Gain YTD-27.995-15.187184%
P/E Ratio13.13263.165%
Revenue2.73B10.6M25,717%
Total Cash149M90.5K164,641%
Total Debt770M6.91M11,148%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBCNCL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTDSX15.670.05
+0.32%
Russell Inv Multifactor US Equity S
WMBLX13.10N/A
N/A
WesMark Balanced
VFWSX131.28N/A
N/A
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Instl
SMITX29.91N/A
N/A
Invesco Summit R5
DBMZX29.46N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr Z

MBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBC has been closely correlated with AMWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBC jumps, then AMWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBC
1D Price
Change %
MBC100%
-0.09%
AMWD - MBC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
PATK - MBC
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
ETD - MBC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
MHK - MBC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
SGI - MBC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
More

NCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCL and KEQU have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCL and KEQU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCL
1D Price
Change %
NCL100%
-12.79%
KEQU - NCL
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
MBC - NCL
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%