MBGAF
Price
$65.61
Change
-$2.43 (-3.57%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
65.31B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
POAHF
Price
$41.64
Change
-$1.46 (-3.39%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
13.17B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBGAF vs POAHF

Header iconMBGAF vs POAHF Comparison
Open Charts MBGAF vs POAHFBanner chart's image
Mercedes Benz Group AG
Price$65.61
Change-$2.43 (-3.57%)
Volume$16.13K
Capitalization65.31B
Porsche Automobile Holding SE
Price$41.64
Change-$1.46 (-3.39%)
Volume$280
Capitalization13.17B
MBGAF vs POAHF Comparison Chart in %
MBGAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
POAHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBGAF vs. POAHF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBGAF is a Hold and POAHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (MBGAF: $65.61 vs. POAHF: $41.64)
Brand notoriety: MBGAF and POAHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBGAF: 83% vs. POAHF: 44%
Market capitalization -- MBGAF: $65.31B vs. POAHF: $13.17B
MBGAF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $65.31B. POAHF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $13.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $38.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBGAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePOAHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBGAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • POAHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBGAF is a better buy in the long-term than POAHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBGAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POAHF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBGAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • POAHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBGAF is a better buy in the short-term than POAHF.

Price Growth

MBGAF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -3.73% price change this week, while POAHF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -4.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBGAF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-4.69% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBGAF($65.3B) has a higher market cap than POAHF($13.2B). MBGAF has higher P/E ratio than POAHF: MBGAF (8.72) vs POAHF (3.00). MBGAF YTD gains are higher at: 18.699 vs. POAHF (10.173). MBGAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6B vs. POAHF (-21.56B). MBGAF has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. POAHF (2.69B). POAHF has less debt than MBGAF: POAHF (7.62B) vs MBGAF (84.4B). MBGAF has higher revenues than POAHF: MBGAF (137B) vs POAHF (-21.65B).
MBGAFPOAHFMBGAF / POAHF
Capitalization65.3B13.2B495%
EBITDA15.6B-21.56B-72%
Gain YTD18.69910.173184%
P/E Ratio8.723.00290%
Revenue137B-21.65B-633%
Total Cash26.1B2.69B970%
Total Debt84.4B7.62B1,108%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBGAF vs POAHF: Fundamental Ratings
MBGAF
POAHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1517
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65100
SMR RATING
1..100
7596
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
940
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

POAHF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MBGAF (19). This means that POAHF’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POAHF (100). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POAHF’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as POAHF (96). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew similarly to POAHF’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as POAHF (48). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew similarly to POAHF’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as POAHF (40). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew similarly to POAHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBGAFPOAHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBGAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
POAHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WRN2.140.07
+3.38%
Western Copper and Gold Corp
TORO3.850.09
+2.39%
Toro Corp
TIMB23.410.29
+1.25%
TIM SA
HE11.40-0.27
-2.31%
Hawaiian Electric Industries
NUWE2.35-0.10
-4.16%
Nuwellis Inc

MBGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBGAF has been closely correlated with MBGYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBGAF jumps, then MBGYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBGAF
1D Price
Change %
MBGAF100%
-3.57%
MBGYY - MBGAF
96%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
VWAPY - MBGAF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
VWAGY - MBGAF
71%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
POAHY - MBGAF
69%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
STLA - MBGAF
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
More

POAHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POAHF has been loosely correlated with POAHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POAHF jumps, then POAHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POAHF
1D Price
Change %
POAHF100%
-3.39%
POAHY - POAHF
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
VWAPY - POAHF
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
VWAGY - POAHF
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
MBGYY - POAHF
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
MBGAF - POAHF
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.57%
More