Advertisement
MBGAF vs POAHY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBGAF is a Hold and POAHY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MBGAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOAHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MBGAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- POAHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MBGAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POAHY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MBGAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- POAHY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MBGAF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -9.57% price change this week, while POAHY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -5.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -6.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
MBGAF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
POAHY is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-6.01% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| MBGAF | POAHY | MBGAF / POAHY | |
| Capitalization | 85.7B | 18.2B | 471% |
| EBITDA | 28.3B | 4.02B | 705% |
| Gain YTD | 3.673 | 13.608 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.90 | 4.13 | 119% |
| Revenue | 154B | 177M | 87,006% |
| Total Cash | 25.5B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 84.1B | N/A | - |
MBGAF | POAHY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
POAHY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MBGAF (39). This means that POAHY’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.
MBGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POAHY (100). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POAHY’s over the last 12 months.
MBGAF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as POAHY (97). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew similarly to POAHY’s over the last 12 months.
POAHY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MBGAF (55). This means that POAHY’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.
MBGAF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POAHY (51). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POAHY’s over the last 12 months.
| MBGAF | POAHY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 60% | 9 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GOVI | 27.18 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Years Trs ETF | |||
| ADVE | 36.09 | -0.09 | -0.24% |
| Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF | |||
| GSJY | 41.42 | -0.15 | -0.37% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Japan Eq ETF | |||
| VTI | 310.89 | -1.36 | -0.44% |
| Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | |||
| PJP | 80.73 | -1.69 | -2.04% |
| Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF | |||
MBGAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBGAF has been closely correlated with MBGYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBGAF jumps, then MBGYY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBGAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBGAF | 100% | -2.35% | ||
| MBGYY - MBGAF | 96% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| VWAPY - MBGAF | 73% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| VWAGY - MBGAF | 71% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| POAHY - MBGAF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| STLA - MBGAF | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
More | ||||
POAHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POAHY has been closely correlated with VWAPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if POAHY jumps, then VWAPY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POAHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POAHY | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| VWAPY - POAHY | 76% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| VWAGY - POAHY | 74% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| MBGAF - POAHY | 69% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| MBGYY - POAHY | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| DRPRY - POAHY | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
More | ||||