MBGAF
Price
$63.02
Change
+$0.34 (+0.54%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
60.61B
69 days until earnings call
POAHY
Price
$4.30
Change
+$0.05 (+1.18%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
13.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBGAF vs POAHY

Header iconMBGAF vs POAHY Comparison
Open Charts MBGAF vs POAHYBanner chart's image
Mercedes Benz Group AG
Price$63.02
Change+$0.34 (+0.54%)
Volume$22.37K
Capitalization60.61B
Porsche Automobile Holding SE
Price$4.30
Change+$0.05 (+1.18%)
Volume$108.98K
Capitalization13.3B
MBGAF vs POAHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POAHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBGAF vs. POAHY commentary
Aug 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBGAF is a Hold and POAHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 22, 2025
Stock price -- (MBGAF: $62.63 vs. POAHY: $4.29)
Brand notoriety: MBGAF and POAHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBGAF: 34% vs. POAHY: 25%
Market capitalization -- MBGAF: $60.61B vs. POAHY: $13.3B
MBGAF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $60.61B. POAHY’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $13.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.03T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBGAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOAHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBGAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • POAHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBGAF is a better buy in the long-term than POAHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBGAF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POAHY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBGAF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • POAHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBGAF is a better buy in the short-term than POAHY.

Price Growth

MBGAF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +0.94% price change this week, while POAHY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBGAF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-1.48% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBGAF($60.6B) has a higher market cap than POAHY($13.3B). MBGAF has higher P/E ratio than POAHY: MBGAF (7.61) vs POAHY (3.00). POAHY YTD gains are higher at: 21.315 vs. MBGAF (13.425). MBGAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.4B vs. POAHY (-21.56B). MBGAF has more cash in the bank: 26.9B vs. POAHY (2.69B). POAHY has less debt than MBGAF: POAHY (7.62B) vs MBGAF (86.4B). MBGAF has higher revenues than POAHY: MBGAF (139B) vs POAHY (-21.65B).
MBGAFPOAHYMBGAF / POAHY
Capitalization60.6B13.3B456%
EBITDA17.4B-21.56B-81%
Gain YTD13.42521.31563%
P/E Ratio7.613.00254%
Revenue139B-21.65B-642%
Total Cash26.9B2.69B1,000%
Total Debt86.4B7.62B1,134%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBGAF vs POAHY: Fundamental Ratings
MBGAF
POAHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1911
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
7797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1453
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

POAHY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MBGAF (36). This means that POAHY’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POAHY (100). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POAHY’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as POAHY (97). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew similarly to POAHY’s over the last 12 months.

POAHY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MBGAF (53). This means that POAHY’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POAHY (53). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POAHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBGAFPOAHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POAHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPE28.320.12
+0.44%
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
JPIE46.29N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Income ETF
MLN16.75-0.01
-0.06%
VanEck Long Muni ETF
OBTC32.00-0.91
-2.77%
Osprey Bitcoin Trust
ETHU139.06-15.97
-10.30%
2x Ether ETF

MBGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBGAF has been closely correlated with MBGYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBGAF jumps, then MBGYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBGAF
1D Price
Change %
MBGAF100%
+2.11%
MBGYY - MBGAF
96%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
VWAPY - MBGAF
73%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
VWAGY - MBGAF
71%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
POAHY - MBGAF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
STLA - MBGAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
More

POAHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POAHY has been closely correlated with VWAPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if POAHY jumps, then VWAPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POAHY
1D Price
Change %
POAHY100%
+1.67%
VWAPY - POAHY
76%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
VWAGY - POAHY
74%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
MBGAF - POAHY
69%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
MBGYY - POAHY
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
DRPRY - POAHY
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
More