MBINM
Price
$25.60
Change
-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
WAL
Price
$77.64
Change
+$1.93 (+2.55%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
14 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MBINM vs WAL

Header iconMBINM vs WAL Comparison
Open Charts MBINM vs WALBanner chart's image
Merchants Ban
Price$25.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Volume$5.58K
CapitalizationN/A
Western Alliance Ban
Price$77.64
Change+$1.93 (+2.55%)
Volume$636.23K
Capitalization6.88B
MBINM vs WAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBINM vs. WAL commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBINM is a StrongBuy and WAL is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (MBINM: $25.65 vs. WAL: $77.64)
Brand notoriety: MBINM and WAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBINM: 99% vs. WAL: 56%
Market capitalization -- MBINM: $0 vs. WAL: $6.88B
MBINM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. WAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBINM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WAL is a better buy in the long-term than MBINM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WAL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WAL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MBINM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while WAL (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

WAL is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.60% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBINM YTD gains are higher at: 1.714 vs. WAL (-6.656). WAL has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. MBINM (10.6M). MBINM has less debt than WAL: MBINM (964M) vs WAL (8.12B). WAL has higher revenues than MBINM: WAL (2.13B) vs MBINM (559M).
MBINMWALMBINM / WAL
CapitalizationN/A6.88B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.714-6.656-26%
P/E RatioN/A9.55-
Revenue559M2.13B26%
Total Cash10.6M289M4%
Total Debt964M8.12B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WAL: Fundamental Ratings
WAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FITE64.201.13
+1.79%
SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
QTJA23.920.24
+1.01%
Innovator Growth Accelerated Pls ETF Jan
RWL100.320.93
+0.94%
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
IVVB29.440.08
+0.27%
iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF
TAFI25.05-0.02
-0.08%
AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF

MBINM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINM
1D Price
Change %
MBINM100%
-0.19%
FHN - MBINM
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.66%
WAL - MBINM
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.55%
HWBK - MBINM
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
FITBI - MBINM
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
CNOBP - MBINM
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More