MBINM
Price
$26.00
Change
+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Updated
Feb 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
WAL
Price
$86.93
Change
+$0.77 (+0.89%)
Updated
Feb 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.88B
47 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MBINM vs WAL

Header iconMBINM vs WAL Comparison
Open Charts MBINM vs WALBanner chart's image
Merchants Ban
Price$26.00
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Volume$1.19K
CapitalizationN/A
Western Alliance Ban
Price$86.93
Change+$0.77 (+0.89%)
Volume$14.13K
Capitalization6.88B
MBINM vs WAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBINM vs. WAL commentary
Mar 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBINM is a Buy and WAL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 01, 2025
Stock price -- (MBINM: $26.07 vs. WAL: $86.92)
Brand notoriety: MBINM and WAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBINM: 94% vs. WAL: 92%
Market capitalization -- MBINM: $0 vs. WAL: $6.88B
MBINM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. WAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBINM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WAL is a better buy in the long-term than MBINM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MBINM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while WAL (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

WAL is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WAL YTD gains are higher at: 4.501 vs. MBINM (1.519). WAL has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. MBINM (10.6M). MBINM has less debt than WAL: MBINM (964M) vs WAL (8.12B). WAL has higher revenues than MBINM: WAL (2.13B) vs MBINM (559M).
MBINMWALMBINM / WAL
CapitalizationN/A6.88B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.5194.50134%
P/E RatioN/A9.55-
Revenue559M2.13B26%
Total Cash10.6M289M4%
Total Debt964M8.12B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WAL: Fundamental Ratings
WAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNDL21.730.29
+1.35%
Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7 Handl™ ETF
DAX37.980.20
+0.53%
Global X DAX Germany ETF
USNZ37.98N/A
N/A
Xtrackers Net Zero Pwy Par Alg US Eq ETF
CEF26.02-0.17
-0.65%
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
BRF11.75-0.19
-1.59%
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF

MBINM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with MBINO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then MBINO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINM
1D Price
Change %
MBINM100%
+0.46%
MBINO - MBINM
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PNFPP - MBINM
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
HBANP - MBINM
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
FHN - MBINM
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
WAL - MBINM
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
More

WAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAL has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WAL jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAL
1D Price
Change %
WAL100%
+0.88%
FNB - WAL
83%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
ABCB - WAL
83%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
HWC - WAL
82%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
UBSI - WAL
82%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
BKU - WAL
82%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
More