MBINM
Price
$25.14
Change
-$0.14 (-0.55%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
WAL
Price
$71.29
Change
-$2.50 (-3.39%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBINM vs WAL

Header iconMBINM vs WAL Comparison
Open Charts MBINM vs WALBanner chart's image
Merchants Ban
Price$25.14
Change-$0.14 (-0.55%)
Volume$34.63K
CapitalizationN/A
Western Alliance Ban
Price$71.29
Change-$2.50 (-3.39%)
Volume$615.7K
Capitalization6.88B
MBINM vs WAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBINM vs. WAL commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBINM is a Hold and WAL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MBINM: $25.14 vs. WAL: $71.29)
Brand notoriety: MBINM and WAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBINM: 401% vs. WAL: 63%
Market capitalization -- MBINM: $0 vs. WAL: $6.88B
MBINM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. WAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBINM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WAL is a better buy in the long-term than MBINM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

MBINM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.12% price change this week, while WAL (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

WAL is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBINM YTD gains are higher at: 1.966 vs. WAL (-13.881). WAL has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. MBINM (10.6M). MBINM has less debt than WAL: MBINM (964M) vs WAL (8.12B). WAL has higher revenues than MBINM: WAL (2.13B) vs MBINM (559M).
MBINMWALMBINM / WAL
CapitalizationN/A6.88B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.966-13.881-14%
P/E RatioN/A9.55-
Revenue559M2.13B26%
Total Cash10.6M289M4%
Total Debt964M8.12B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WAL: Fundamental Ratings
WAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COPJ23.970.30
+1.27%
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
IAPR28.91-0.18
-0.62%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
EEMX36.25-0.60
-1.62%
SPDR® MSCI Em Mkts Fssl Ful Free RsrvETF
IGR5.15-0.10
-1.90%
CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund
FEZ59.20-1.21
-2.00%
SPDR® EURO STOXX 50 ETF

MBINM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINM
1D Price
Change %
MBINM100%
+1.52%
FHN - MBINM
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
WAL - MBINM
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.39%
HWBK - MBINM
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
CNOBP - MBINM
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
HTBK - MBINM
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
More

WAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAL has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WAL jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAL
1D Price
Change %
WAL100%
-3.39%
SNV - WAL
88%
Closely correlated
-2.92%
FNB - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
ZION - WAL
86%
Closely correlated
-2.65%
ABCB - WAL
86%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
EWBC - WAL
86%
Closely correlated
-2.89%
More