MBKL
Price
$21.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
50.07M
NCXS
Price
$53.00
Change
-$0.70 (-1.30%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBKL vs NCXS

Header iconMBKL vs NCXS Comparison
Open Charts MBKL vs NCXSBanner chart's image
MBT Bancshares
Price$21.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization50.07M
NBC Ban
Price$53.00
Change-$0.70 (-1.30%)
Volume$2.3K
CapitalizationN/A
MBKL vs NCXS Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBKL vs. NCXS commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBKL is a Hold and NCXS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MBKL: $21.00 vs. NCXS: $53.00)
Brand notoriety: MBKL and NCXS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBKL: 43% vs. NCXS: 214%
Market capitalization -- MBKL: $50.07M vs. NCXS: $0
MBKL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $50.07M. NCXS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBKL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNCXS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MBKL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NCXS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBKL is a better buy in the long-term than NCXS.

Price Growth

MBKL (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NCXS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

NCXS is expected to report earnings on Apr 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.63% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCXS YTD gains are higher at: 21.005 vs. MBKL (5.000).
MBKLNCXSMBKL / NCXS
Capitalization50.1MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.00021.00524%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue15.1MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBKL vs NCXS: Fundamental Ratings
MBKL
NCXS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4794
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
9100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
563
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a5

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBKL's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NCXS (43). This means that MBKL’s stock grew similarly to NCXS’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCXS (100). This means that MBKL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCXS’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCXS (100). This means that MBKL’s stock grew significantly faster than NCXS’s over the last 12 months.

NCXS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MBKL (48). This means that NCXS’s stock grew similarly to MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

NCXS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBKL (56). This means that NCXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAMB22.930.15
+0.67%
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF
GFEB38.200.04
+0.10%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Feb
FLLA21.33-0.02
-0.11%
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
SPYV50.97-0.14
-0.27%
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
TSLY8.96-0.30
-3.24%
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF

NCXS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCXS and GSBX have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCXS and GSBX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCXS
1D Price
Change %
NCXS100%
N/A
GSBX - NCXS
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - NCXS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSBB - NCXS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBPI - NCXS
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.65%
BKIMF - NCXS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More