MBKL
Price
$21.75
Change
+$0.24 (+1.12%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
50.07M
SRNN
Price
$11.25
Change
-$0.44 (-3.76%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
10.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBKL vs SRNN

Header iconMBKL vs SRNN Comparison
Open Charts MBKL vs SRNNBanner chart's image
MBT Bancshares
Price$21.75
Change+$0.24 (+1.12%)
Volume$100
Capitalization50.07M
Southern Banc Company, Inc. (The)
Price$11.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.76%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.6M
MBKL vs SRNN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MBKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBKL vs. SRNN commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBKL is a Hold and SRNN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MBKL: $21.75 vs. SRNN: $11.25)
Brand notoriety: MBKL and SRNN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBKL: 43% vs. SRNN: 36%
Market capitalization -- MBKL: $50.07M vs. SRNN: $10.6M
MBKL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $50.07M. SRNN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBKL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRNN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBKL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRNN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBKL is a better buy in the long-term than SRNN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBKL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRNN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBKL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SRNN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MBKL and SRNN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MBKL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.12% price change this week, while SRNN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBKL($50.1M) has a higher market cap than SRNN($10.6M). MBKL YTD gains are higher at: 11.402 vs. SRNN (-18.189).
MBKLSRNNMBKL / SRNN
Capitalization50.1M10.6M473%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.402-18.189-63%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue15.1MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBKL vs SRNN: Fundamental Ratings
MBKL
SRNN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9729
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5750
SMR RATING
1..100
5269
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRNN's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as MBKL (36). This means that SRNN’s stock grew similarly to MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

SRNN's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MBKL (57). This means that SRNN’s stock grew similarly to MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SRNN (69). This means that MBKL’s stock grew similarly to SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SRNN (61). This means that MBKL’s stock grew similarly to SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

SRNN's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBKL (48). This means that SRNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBKLSRNN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOZTY9.70N/A
N/A
Boozt AB
HFBK34.50N/A
N/A
Harford Bank
VLMTY32.80N/A
N/A
Valmet OYJ
MSLVF0.09N/A
N/A
FIRST ANDES SILVER LTD.
SOAGY41.36-0.22
-0.53%
Sartorius AG

MBKL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBKL has been loosely correlated with CMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBKL jumps, then CMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBKL
1D Price
Change %
MBKL100%
+1.12%
CMGGF - MBKL
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - MBKL
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - MBKL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBF - MBKL
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
HCBN - MBKL
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More

SRNN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRNN and FSUN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRNN and FSUN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRNN
1D Price
Change %
SRNN100%
N/A
FSUN - SRNN
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
BNCZF - SRNN
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - SRNN
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
WFCL - SRNN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERKH - SRNN
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
More